Obesity, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, and Infertility: A New Avenue for GLP-1 Receptor Agonists
Open accessAbstract
CONTEXT: Obesity is responsible for an increased risk of sub-fecundity and infertility. Obese women show poorer reproductive outcomes regardless of the mode of conception, and higher body mass index (BMI) is associated with poorer fertility prognosis. Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is one of the leading causes of infertility, and many women with PCOS are also overweight or obese. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: The aim of the present narrative review is to describe the mechanisms responsible for the development of infertility and PCOS in women with obesity/overweight, with a focus on the emerging role of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) as a therapeutic option for obese women with PCOS. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Weight reduction represents the most significant factor affecting fertility and pregnancy outcomes. Current experimental and clinical evidence suggests the presence of an underlying pathophysiological link between obesity, GLP-1 kinetic alterations, and PCOS pathogenesis. Based on the positive results in patients affected by obesity, with or without diabetes, the administration of GLP-1 RA (mainly liraglutide) alone or in combination with metformin has been investigated in women with obesity and PCOS. Several studies demonstrated significant weight loss and testosterone reduction, with mixed results relative to improvements in insulin resistance parameters and menstrual patterns. CONCLUSIONS: The weight loss effects of GLP-1 RA offer a unique opportunity to expand the treatment options available to PCOS patients.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Obesity is a key component of developing hyperinsulinemia, which plays a fundamental role in the pathomechanism of PCOS.
“Obesity, a global pandemic, is a key component of developing hyperinsulinemia, which plays a fundamental role in the pathomechanism of PCOS [84].”
From The Role of Glp-1 Receptor Agonists in Insulin Resistance with Concomitant Obesity Treatment in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (2022) · cites this paper as [84]
Higher circulating levels of insulin increase ovarian androgen production, which has a strong influence on PCOS symptoms.
“Higher circulating levels of insulin increase ovarian androgen production, which has a strong influence on PCOS symptoms [84,85].”
From The Role of Glp-1 Receptor Agonists in Insulin Resistance with Concomitant Obesity Treatment in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (2022) · cites this paper as [84]
Exacerbation of the symptoms of PCOS is associated with the concomitant presence of obesity, which further increases hyperinsulinemia.
“Additionally, exacerbation of the symptoms of PCOS is associated with the concomitant presence of obesity, which further increases hyperinsulinemia [84,87].”
From The Role of Glp-1 Receptor Agonists in Insulin Resistance with Concomitant Obesity Treatment in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (2022) · cites this paper as [84]
Adipocytes are responsible for the functional alteration of the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian (HPO) axis due to aromatization of androgens to estrogens, which by negative feedback loop suppress gonadotropin production.
“Furthermore, adipocytes are responsible for the functional alteration of the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian (HPO) axis due to aromatization of androgens to estrogens, which by negative feedback loop, suppress gonadotropin production [84,86].”
From The Role of Glp-1 Receptor Agonists in Insulin Resistance with Concomitant Obesity Treatment in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (2022) · cites this paper as [84]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 100 · Cited by 356
- Authors
- Cena, H., Chiovato, L., & Nappi, R. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Pavia (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Cena, Hellas
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 2020-05-22
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- e2695-e2709
- ISSN
- 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7197
- PMC
- PMC7457958
- OpenAlex
- W3026155818
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 100
- Citations by year
- 2026: 56 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 93 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 5.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Novo Nordisk
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Keywords
- obesity, polycystic ovary syndrome, infertility, GLP-1 receptor agonists, liraglutide, metformin, weight loss, insulin resistance, testosterone, menstrual irregularity, body mass index, female fertility
- MeSH terms
- Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor, Liraglutide, Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Humans, Infertility, Female, Metformin, Obesity, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Testosterone, Weight Loss, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Incretins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review