Cited by 29Physical Activity and HealthDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Association of Longitudinal Activity Measures and Diabetes Risk: An Analysis From the National Institutes of Health All of Us Research Program

Open access
Perry, Andrew S, Annis, Jeffrey S, Master, Hiral, Nayor, Matthew, Hughes, Andrew, Kouame, Aymone, Natarajan, Karthik, Marginean, Kayla +5 more·2023·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

Context: Prior studies of the relationship between physical activity and incident type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) relied primarily on questionnaires at a single time point. Objective: We sought to investigate the relationship between physical activity and incident T2DM with an innovative approach using data from commercial wearable devices linked to electronic health records in a real-world population. Methods: Using All of Us participants’ accelerometer data from their personal Fitbit devices, we used a time-varying Cox proportional hazards models with repeated measures of physical activity for the outcome of incident T2DM. We evaluated for effect modification with age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and sedentary time using multiplicative interaction terms. Results: From 5677 participants in the All of Us Research Program (median age 51 years; 74% female; 89% White), there were 97 (2%) cases of incident T2DM over a median follow-up period of 3.8 years between 2010 to 2021. In models adjusted for age, sex, and race, the hazard of incident diabetes was reduced by 44% (95% CI, 15%-63%; P = 0.01) when comparing those with an average daily step count of 10 700 to those with 6000. Similar benefits were seen comparing groups based on average duration of various intensities of activity (eg, lightly active, fairly active, very active). There was no evidence for effect modification by age, sex, BMI, or sedentary time. Conclusion: Greater time in any type of physical activity intensity was associated with lower risk of T2DM irrespective of age, sex, BMI, or sedentary time.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/clinem/dgac695

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other models in the same longitudinal study reported stronger effects (e.g., HR = 0.56), which would have yielded a more favourable estimate (HR = 0.77) for the same step increase.

    “Other models in the same study reported stronger effects (e.g., HR = 0.56), which would have yielded a more favourable estimate (HR = 0.77) for the same step increase.”

    From Economic evaluation of wearable fitness trackers versus metformin for preventing type 2 diabetes in the UK population (2025) · cites this paper as [26]

    Table 2 (labeled Conclusions; page unavailable) reports an HR of 0.56 for 10,690 versus 5,970 mean daily steps in the age-, sex-, and race-adjusted model. The paper does not report an HR of 0.77 for a smaller step increase; that figure is the citing authors’ proposed recalculation, not a result stated in the source. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A longitudinal study using repeated measures and automatic data collection from wearable fitness trackers found that higher levels of physical activity, as measured by daily steps, were associated with a lower risk for incident T2D.

    “A longitudinal study [26] that used repeated measures and automatic data collection from wearable fitness trackers found that higher levels of physical activity (as measured by daily steps) were associated with a lower risk for incident T2D.”
  • An additional 2,132 steps per day is associated with a reduced hazard ratio of 0.81 for incident T2D.

    “We deduced that an additional 2,132 steps per day is associated with a reduced hazard ratio (HR) of 0.81 for incident T2D.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 29

Authors
Perry, A. S., Annis, J. S., Master, H., Nayor, M., Hughes, A., Kouame, A., Natarajan, K., Marginean, K., Murthy, V., Roden, D. M., Harris, P. A., Shah, R., & Brittain, E. L.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Boston University (US)
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Perry, Andrew S
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2022-12-02
Volume
108
Issue
5
Pages
1101-1109
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W4310595908
Cited by
29
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3
FWCI
2.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • NHLBI (R61 HL158941, R01 HL146588)
  • NIDDK (R01 DK124845)
  • Office of the Director
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, physical activity, accelerometer-measured activity, wearable devices, Fitbit, step count, physical activity intensity, incident diabetes risk, sedentary time, body mass index, effect modification, All of Us
MeSH terms
Population Health, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, National Institutes of Health (U.S.), Risk Factors, United States, Body Mass Index, Incidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review