Association of Longitudinal Activity Measures and Diabetes Risk: An Analysis From the National Institutes of Health All of Us Research Program
Open accessAbstract
Context: Prior studies of the relationship between physical activity and incident type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) relied primarily on questionnaires at a single time point. Objective: We sought to investigate the relationship between physical activity and incident T2DM with an innovative approach using data from commercial wearable devices linked to electronic health records in a real-world population. Methods: Using All of Us participants’ accelerometer data from their personal Fitbit devices, we used a time-varying Cox proportional hazards models with repeated measures of physical activity for the outcome of incident T2DM. We evaluated for effect modification with age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and sedentary time using multiplicative interaction terms. Results: From 5677 participants in the All of Us Research Program (median age 51 years; 74% female; 89% White), there were 97 (2%) cases of incident T2DM over a median follow-up period of 3.8 years between 2010 to 2021. In models adjusted for age, sex, and race, the hazard of incident diabetes was reduced by 44% (95% CI, 15%-63%; P = 0.01) when comparing those with an average daily step count of 10 700 to those with 6000. Similar benefits were seen comparing groups based on average duration of various intensities of activity (eg, lightly active, fairly active, very active). There was no evidence for effect modification by age, sex, BMI, or sedentary time. Conclusion: Greater time in any type of physical activity intensity was associated with lower risk of T2DM irrespective of age, sex, BMI, or sedentary time.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Other models in the same longitudinal study reported stronger effects (e.g., HR = 0.56), which would have yielded a more favourable estimate (HR = 0.77) for the same step increase.
“Other models in the same study reported stronger effects (e.g., HR = 0.56), which would have yielded a more favourable estimate (HR = 0.77) for the same step increase.”
From Economic evaluation of wearable fitness trackers versus metformin for preventing type 2 diabetes in the UK population (2025) · cites this paper as [26]
Table 2 (labeled Conclusions; page unavailable) reports an HR of 0.56 for 10,690 versus 5,970 mean daily steps in the age-, sex-, and race-adjusted model. The paper does not report an HR of 0.77 for a smaller step increase; that figure is the citing authors’ proposed recalculation, not a result stated in the source. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredA longitudinal study using repeated measures and automatic data collection from wearable fitness trackers found that higher levels of physical activity, as measured by daily steps, were associated with a lower risk for incident T2D.
“A longitudinal study [26] that used repeated measures and automatic data collection from wearable fitness trackers found that higher levels of physical activity (as measured by daily steps) were associated with a lower risk for incident T2D.”
From Economic evaluation of wearable fitness trackers versus metformin for preventing type 2 diabetes in the UK population (2025) · cites this paper as [26]
An additional 2,132 steps per day is associated with a reduced hazard ratio of 0.81 for incident T2D.
“We deduced that an additional 2,132 steps per day is associated with a reduced hazard ratio (HR) of 0.81 for incident T2D.”
From Economic evaluation of wearable fitness trackers versus metformin for preventing type 2 diabetes in the UK population (2025) · cites this paper as [26]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 29
- Authors
- Perry, A. S., Annis, J. S., Master, H., Nayor, M., Hughes, A., Kouame, A., Natarajan, K., Marginean, K., Murthy, V., Roden, D. M., Harris, P. A., Shah, R., & Brittain, E. L.
- Affiliations
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- Boston University (US)
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
- Columbia University (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Perry, Andrew S
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 2022-12-02
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1101-1109
- ISSN
- 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7197
- PMC
- PMC10306083
- OpenAlex
- W4310595908
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 2.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- NHLBI (R61 HL158941, R01 HL146588)
- NIDDK (R01 DK124845)
- Office of the Director
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Keywords
- type 2 diabetes, physical activity, accelerometer-measured activity, wearable devices, Fitbit, step count, physical activity intensity, incident diabetes risk, sedentary time, body mass index, effect modification, All of Us
- MeSH terms
- Population Health, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, National Institutes of Health (U.S.), Risk Factors, United States, Body Mass Index, Incidence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review