The use of levothyroxine absorption tests in clinical practice
Abstract
Although levothyroxine (LT4) is a widely prescribed drug, more than 30% of LT4-treated patients fail to achieve the recommended serum level of thyrotropin with a body weight-based dose of LT4. An LT4 absorption test (LT4AT) is part of the workup for confirming normal LT4 absorption or diagnosing malabsorption. We searched PubMed with the terms levothyrox*, L-T4, LT4, TT4, FT4, FT3, TT3, test, loading, uptake, absorp*, "absorb*, bioavailab*, bioequiv* malabsorb*, and pseudomalabsorb*. A total of 43 full-text publications were analyzed. The published procedures for LT4AT differ markedly in the test dose, formulation, test duration, frequency of blood collection, analyte (total thyroxine [TT4] or free thyroxine [FT4]), metric (absolute or relative peak or increment, or area under the curve) and the threshold for normal absorption. In a standardized LT4AT for routine use, the physician could advise the patient to not consume food, beverages, or medications the morning of the test; administer 1000 µg of LT4 in the patient's usual formulation as the test dose; ensure that the patient is supervised throughout the LT4AT; perform a 4-hour test, with hourly blood samples; assay FT4; and consider that normal LT4 absorption corresponds to an FT4 increment of more than 0.40 ng/dL (5.14 pmol/L) or a TT4 increment of more than 6 μg/dL (77.23 nmol/L) for a test dose of at least 300 µg, or a percentage TT4 absorption of more than 60%. If the test indicates abnormal LT4 absorption, the physician can increase the LT4 dose, change the formulation or administration route, and/or refer the patient to a gastroenterologist.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is variability in procedures for LT4 absorption test, including dose of levothyroxine, duration of sampling, frequency of blood collection, and interpretation of results.
“There was some variability about the procedures for LT4 absorption test; namely the dose of levothyroxine and duration of sampling, the frequency of blood collection and the interpretation of the results (32).”
From ETA guidelines for the use of levothyroxine sodium preparations in monotherapy to optimize the treatment of hypothyroidism (2025) · cites this paper as [32]
LT4 absorption test is an effective and safe way to assess refractory hypothyroidism, providing reliable information to distinguish LT4 malabsorption from pseudomalabsorption.
“The LT4 absorption test proved to be an effective and safe way to assess refractory hypothyroidism, providing reliable information to distinguish LT4 malabsorption from ‘pseudomalabsorption’, a condition of intentional or unintentional non-adherence (32).”
From ETA guidelines for the use of levothyroxine sodium preparations in monotherapy to optimize the treatment of hypothyroidism (2025) · cites this paper as [32]
A small proportion of elderly patients and those with heart disease are at risk of angina or cardiac arrhythmia from a higher-than-usual levothyroxine dose.
“A small proportion of elderly patients and those with heart diseases are at risk of developing angina or cardiac arrhythmia due to a higher-than-usual dose of LT4.”
From Refractory hypothyroidism: unraveling the complexities of diagnosis and management (2023) · cites this paper as [76]
Levothyroxine absorption is considered normal if the free T4 peak rises by more than 0.40 ng/dL, if total T4 peak exceeds 6 mg/dL, or if total T4 absorption exceeds 60%.
“LT4 absorption is considered normal in any of these 3 scenarios: if there is an increase greater than 0.40 ng/dL in the peak concentration of fT4, if the peak concentration of tT4 exceeds 6 mg/dL, or if the percentage absorption of tT4 is greater than 60% 76”
From Refractory hypothyroidism: unraveling the complexities of diagnosis and management (2023) · cites this paper as [76]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 81 · Cited by 18
- Authors
- Caron, P., & Declèves, X.
- Affiliations
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse (FR)
- Inserm (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Caron, Philippe
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 2023-03-14
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1875-1888
- ISSN
- 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7197
- OpenAlex
- W4324128968
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 81
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5
- FWCI
- 3.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Merck
- Merck KGaA
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems
- Keywords
- levothyroxine, free thyroxine, total thyroxine, levothyroxine dose adjustment, hyperthyroidism, test standardization
- MeSH terms
- Biological Transport, Body Weight, Humans, Hypothyroidism, Thyrotropin, Thyroxine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review