Cited by 86Bone health and osteoporosis researchBone health and treatmentsMenopause: Health Impacts and Treatments

Sequential Therapy for the Long-Term Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

Open access
Ramchand, Sabashini K, Leder, Benjamin Z·2024·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a chronic condition characterized by decreased bone mass, loss of skeletal integrity, and increased susceptibility to fracture. Drugs used to treat osteoporosis can be classified as those that block bone resorption (antiresorptive), stimulate bone formation (anabolic), or do both. While all currently approved medications reduce the risk of fragility fractures in high-risk populations, they are generally unable to fully restore bone strength in most patients with established disease. Thus, the majority of patients require disease management over many years. Unfortunately, the continuous use of a single drug has limitations, both in terms of efficacy and safety, and so sequential therapy is commonly required. Given the expanding list of pharmacological agents currently available, careful consideration needs to be given as to which drugs to use and in what sequence. This review will evaluate the differential effects of antiresorptive, bone-forming, and dual-acting drugs when used in specific sequences and will explore the current evidence favoring the initial use of bone-forming/dual-acting drugs followed by antiresorptive medications. This review will also examine the notion that long-term treatment with an antiresorptive drug may diminish the efficacy of subsequent treatment with a bone-forming/dual-acting drug. Finally, this review will explore the current evidence pertaining to the specific issue of how to best prevent the clinical ramifications of denosumab cessation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/clinem/dgad496

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Anti-resorptive drugs such as bisphosphonates and denosumab cause severe adverse events, poor compliance, and easy recurrence.

    “However, these drugs cause severe adverse events, poor compliance, and easy recurrence61”

    From Targeting Msx2 as a brake in the fusion fate of osteoclasts and an anabolic therapy in pre-clinical models of osteoporosis (2025) · cites this paper as [61]

    The Abstract (page not provided) identifies rare but serious side effects as a concern with long-term bisphosphonate and denosumab use. The Denosumab Discontinuation section describes rebound bone loss and increased fracture risk after denosumab is stopped, not easy recurrence with both drugs. The passages do not support the claim of poor compliance. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 83 · Cited by 86

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Parfitt AM. Skeletal heterogeneity and the purposes of bone remod- elling: implications for the understanding of osteoporosis. In: Marcus RFD and Kelsey J, eds. Osteoporosis. Academic Press; 1996:315-339.
  2. Tsai JN, Sassana G, Ramchand SK, Jordan M, Ryan S, Leder BZ. Comparison of alendronate versus raloxifene after denosumab dis- continuation (CARD): A randomized controlled trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2023;38(1):26-34.
  3. Tsai JN, Nishiyama KK, Lin D, et al. Effects of denosumab and ter- iparatide transitions on bone microarchitecture and estimated 310 The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2024, Vol. 109, No. 2
  4. strength: the DATA-switch HR-pQCT study. J Bone Miner Res. 2017;32(10):2001-2009.
  5. McClung MR, Grauer A, Boonen S, et al. Romosozumab in post- menopausal women with low bone mineral density. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(5):412-420.

Authors
Ramchand, S. K., & Leder, B. Z.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Leder, Benjamin Z
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2023-08-23
Volume
109
Issue
2
Pages
303-311
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W4386116238
Cited by
86
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 2
FWCI
4.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Bone health and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
Keywords
postmenopausal osteoporosis, sequential therapy, antiresorptive agents, dual-acting drugs, denosumab, treatment switching, denosumab discontinuation
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Osteoporosis, Bone Density, Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal, Bone Density Conservation Agents, Fractures, Bone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review