Molecular Phenotyping of Human Endometrium Distinguishes Menstrual Cycle Phases and Underlying Biological Processes in Normo-Ovulatory Women
Abstract
Histological evaluation of endometrium has been the gold standard for clinical diagnosis and management of women with endometrial disorders. However, several recent studies have questioned the accuracy and utility of such evaluation, mainly because of significant intra- and interobserver variations in histological interpretation. To examine the possibility that biochemical or molecular signatures of endometrium may prove to be more useful, we have investigated whole-genome molecular phenotyping (54,600 genes and expressed sequence tags) of this tissue sampled across the cycle in 28 normo-ovulatory women, using high-density oligonucleotide microarrays. Unsupervised principal component analysis of all samples revealed that samples self-cluster into four groups consistent with histological phenotypes of proliferative (PE), early-secretory (ESE), mid-secretory (MSE), and late-secretory (LSE) endometrium. Independent hierarchical clustering analysis revealed equivalent results, with two major dendrogram branches corresponding to PE/ESE and MSE/LSE and sub-branching into the four respective phases with heterogeneity among samples within each sub-branch. K-means clustering of genes revealed four major patterns of gene expression (high in PE, high in ESE, high in MSE, and high in LSE), and gene ontology analysis of these clusters demonstrated cycle-phase-specific biological processes and molecular functions. Six samples with ambiguous histology were identically assignable to a cycle phase by both principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering. Additionally, pairwise comparisons of relative gene expression across the cycle revealed genes/families that clearly distinguish the transitions of PE→ESE, ESE→MSE, and MSE→LSE, including receptomes and signaling pathways. Select genes were validated by quantitative RT-PCR. Overall, the results demonstrate that endometrial samples obtained by two different sampling techniques (biopsy and curetting hysterectomy specimens) from subjects who are as normal as possible in a human study and including those with unknown histology, can be classified by their molecular signatures and correspond to known phases of the menstrual cycle with identical results using two independent analytical methods. Also, the results enable global identification of biological processes and molecular mechanisms that occur dynamically in the endometrium in the changing steroid hormone milieu across the menstrual cycle in normo-ovulatory women. The results underscore the potential of gene expression profiling for developing molecular diagnostics of endometrial normalcy and abnormalities and identifying molecular targets for therapeutic purposes in endometrial disorders.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Whole genome profiling of normal endometrium revealed tremendous molecular variation between samples taken from the proliferative, early-secretory, midsecretory, and late-secretory phases of the menstrual cycle.
“Whole genome profiling of normal endometrium revealed tremendous molecular variation between samples taken from the proliferative, early-secretory, midsecretory, and late-secretory phases of the menstrual cycle [109]”
From Update on biomarkers for the detection of endometriosis (2015) · cites this paper as [109]
The endometrium evidences remarkable sex steroid-driven cyclic variation and regenerative capacity.
“First, the endometrium evidences remarkable sex steroid-driven cyclic variation and regenerative capacity.”
From Update on biomarkers for the detection of endometriosis (2015) · cites this paper as [109]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 93 · Cited by 589
- Authors
- Talbi, S., Hamilton, A. E., Vo, K. C., Tulac, S., Overgaard, M. T., Dosiou, C., Le Shay, N., Nezhat, C. N., Kempson, R., Lessey, B. A., Nayak, N. R., & Giudice, L. C.
- Affiliations
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- Prisma Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Giudice, L. C.
- Venue
- Endocrinology
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 2006-03-01
- Volume
- 147
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1097-1121
- ISSN
- 0013-7227 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7170
- OpenAlex
- W2164002837
- Cited by
- 589
- References
- 93
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 33
- FWCI
- 8.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5k12hd043452-05)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
- University of California, San Francisco
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD 043452-03, HD 31398-09, U54HD031398)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
- Keywords
- endometrium, menstrual cycle phases, gene expression profiling, endometrial receptivity, luteal phase, proliferative phase, molecular phenotyping, endometrial histology, Gene Ontology, endometrial pathology, molecular diagnosis
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Algorithms, Biopsy, Endometrium, Female, Gene Expression Regulation, Multigene Family, Humans, Menstrual Cycle, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Ovulation, Phenotype, Steroids, Uterine Diseases, Uterus, Signal Transduction, Down-Regulation, Up-Regulation, Cluster Analysis, Genome, Endometrial Neoplasms, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Gene Expression Profiling, Principal Component Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review