Cited by 76Estrogen and related hormone effectsGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals

A Splice Variant of Estrogen Receptor β Missing Exon 3 Displays Altered Subnuclear Localization and Capacity for Transcriptional Activation*

Price, Richard H., Butler, Cheryl A., Webb, Paul, Uht, Rosalie, Kushner, Peter, Handa, Robert J.·2001·Endocrinology

Abstract

There are two separate estrogen receptors (ERs), ERalpha and ERbeta. The ERbeta gene is variably spliced, and in some cases variant expression is high. Besides the full-length ERbeta (equivalent to ERbeta1), splice variants can encode proteins bearing an insert within the ligand-binding domain (beta2), a deletion of exon 3 (ERbeta1delta3) disrupting the DNA-binding domain, or both (ERbeta2delta3). Here we examine the intracellular localization and transcriptional properties of each of the ERbeta splice variants heterologously expressed in cultured cells. In accordance with ERalpha, ERbeta1 and ERbeta2 are both distributed in a reticular pattern within the nucleus after exposure to ligand. In contrast, ERbeta1delta3 and ERbeta2delta3 localize to discrete spots within the nucleus in the presence of ER agonists. In the presence of ER antagonists, the delta3 variants are distributed diffusely within the nucleus. We also show that the spots are stable nuclear structures to which the delta3 variants localize in a ligand-dependent manner. Coactivator proteins of ER colocalize with delta3 variants in the spots in the presence of agonists. The delta3 variants of ERbeta can activate luciferase reporter constructs containing an activator protein complex-1 site, but not an estrogen response element (ERE). These data suggest that without an intact DNA-binding domain, ERbeta is functionally altered, allowing localization to discrete nuclear spots and activation from activator protein-1-con…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/endo.142.5.8130

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Price, R. H., Butler, C. A., Webb, P., Uht, R., Kushner, P., & Handa, R. J.
Affiliations
  • Loyola University Chicago (US)
  • Colorado State University (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Handa, Robert J.
Venue
Endocrinology
Published
2001-05-01
Volume
142
Issue
5
Pages
2039-2049
ISSN
  • 0013-7227 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7170
OpenAlex
W2065421743
Cited by
76
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Keywords
estrogen receptor beta, splice variants, exon 3 deletion, subnuclear localization, transcriptional activation, activator protein-1, DNA-binding domain, transcriptional coactivator, estrogen response element
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Nucleus, Exons, Cricetinae, Humans, Nuclear Proteins, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Protein Conformation, Receptors, Estrogen, Transcription Factors, Transcriptional Activation, Trans-Activators, CHO Cells, COS Cells, Protein Isoforms, Estrogen Receptor beta, CREB-Binding Protein, Nuclear Receptor Coactivator 2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review