The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
VI. Meta-Analysis of Calcitonin for the Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To review the effect of calcitonin on bone density and fractures in postmenopausal women. DATA SOURCE: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE from 1966 to 2000 and examined citations of relevant articles and the proceedings of international osteoporosis meetings. We contacted osteoporosis investigators to identify additional studies and primary authors for unpublished data. STUDY SELECTION: We included 30 studies that randomized women to calcitonin or an alternative (placebo or calcium and/or vitamin D) and measured bone density or fracture incidence for at least 1 yr. DATA EXTRACTION: For each trial, three independent reviewers assessed the methodological quality and abstracted data. DATA SYNTHESIS: Calcitonin reduced the incidence of vertebral fractures, with a pooled relative risk (RR) of 0.46 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.25-0.87, P = 0.02, n = 1404, 4 trials]. However, the RR from the one relatively large randomized controlled trial (RCT) was 0.79 (95% CI 0.62-1.00, P = 0.05, n = 1108). For nonvertebral fractures, the pooled RR was 0.52 (95% CI 0.22-1.23, P = 0.14, n = 1481, 3 trials). Once again, the single large trial showed a less impressive effect than the smaller trials (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.59-1.09, P = 0.16, n = 1245). For bone density of the lumbar spine, the pooled weekly dose of 250 to 2800 IU per week resulted in significant increase in the weighted mean difference (WMD) of 3.74 (2.04-5.43, P < 0.01, n = 2260, 24 trials). The combined forearm showed a similar effect, with a WMD of 3.02 (95% CI 0.98-5.07, P < 0.01, n = 468, 9 trials). At the femoral neck, the pooled weighted mean difference showed a nonsignificant trend toward benefit, WMD 3.80 (95% CI -0.32-7.91, P = 0.07, 9 trials, n = 513). Methodologically weaker studies tended to show greater effects on bone density, and the lumbar spine results suggested the possibility of publication bias. CONCLUSIONS: Calcitonin likely increases bone density in postmenopausal women predominantly at the lumbar spine and forearm for weekly doses of greater than 250 IU, although the true effect may be smaller than the pooled estimate would suggest. Calcitonin likely reduces the risk of vertebral fracture; its effect on nonvertebral fracture remains uncertain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chesnut, C. H., Silverman, S., Andriano, K., Genant, H., Gimona, A., Harris, S., Kiel, D., LeBoff, M., Maricic, M., Miller, P., et al. (2000) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00490-3 · Cited by 1,122
Evidence for efficacy of drugs affecting bone metabolism in preventing hip fracture.
Kanis, J. A., Johnell, O., Gullberg, B., Allander, E., Dilşen, G., Gennari, C., Lopes Vaz, A. A., Lyritis, G. P., Mazzuoli, G., & Miravet, L. (1992) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.305.6862.1124 · Cited by 285
Takahashi, S., Goldring, S., Katz, M., Hilsenbeck, S., Williams, R., & Roodman, G. D. (1995) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci117634 · Cited by 125
Cited by
Qaseem, A., Forciea, M. A., McLean, R. M., Denberg, T. D., & for the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians* (2017) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m15-1361 · Cited by 676
MacLean, C., Newberry, S., Maglione, M., McMahon, M., Ranganath, V., Suttorp, M., Mojica, W., Timmer, M., Alexander, A., McNamara, M., et al. (2008) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-148-3-200802050-00198 · Cited by 529
Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials
Pildal, J., Hrobjartsson, A., Jorgensen, K., Hilden, J., Altman, D., & Gotzsche, P. (2007) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dym087 · Cited by 472
Qaseem, A., Snow, V., Shekelle, P., Hopkins, R., Forciea, M. A., Owens, D. K., & Clinical Efficacy Assessment Subcommittee of the American College of Physicians (2008) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-149-6-200809160-00007 · Cited by 180
Patient Adherence to Osteoporosis Medications: Problems, Consequences and Management Strategies
Papaioannou, A., Kennedy, C. C., Dolovich, L., Lau, E., & Adachi, J. D. (2007) · Drugs & Aging · doi:10.2165/00002512-200724010-00003 · Cited by 151
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cranney, A., Tugwell, P., Zytaruk, N., Robinson, V., Weaver, B., Shea, B., Wells, G., Adachi, J., Waldegger, L., Guyatt, G., The Osteoporosis Methodology Group, & The Osteoporosis Research Advisory Group
- Venue
- Endocrine Reviews
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 2002-08-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 540-551
- ISSN
- 0163-769X (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7189
- OpenAlex
- W2034359489
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 2.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: VI. Meta-Analysis of Calcitonin for the Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/er.2001-6002
- The paper
- Cranney, A., Tugwell, P., Zytaruk, N., Robinson, V., Weaver, B., Shea, B., Wells, G., Adachi, J., Waldegger, L., Guyatt, G., The Osteoporosis Methodology Group, & The Osteoporosis Research Advisory Group. (2002). VI. Meta-Analysis of Calcitonin for the Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis. Endocrine Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2001-6002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.