A Minimal Mathematical Model of Calcium Homeostasis
Abstract
A mathematical model of calcium homeostasis is presented in which the controlling factors are the plasma concentrations of calcium, PTH, and calcitriol, and the effector organs are the parathyroids, bone, kidney, and intestine. Other factors can be added as the need arises. The model is aimed at simulating what happens in a single individual, but its parameters and variables were adjusted to the corresponding published average values. Simulations of published observations in humans undergoing the infusion of calcium or its chelators are presented. With a single exception, these simulations provided a good fit to the data. The response of the system to extrinsic perturbations was characterized by simulating chronic infusions of calcium, PTH, and calcitriol. Finally, the steady state response to perturbations in some of its parameters (the secretory mass of the parathyroids and the affinity and/or sensitivity of the calcium, PTH, and calcitriol receptors) and to renal failure were also investigated in an attempt to analyze the pathogenesis of clinical hypo- or hypercalcemias. In its present form the model cannot be used to base clinical decisions in individual cases. However, it requires modest computational resources, and clinicians with a modest mathematical background can manipulate it. It is a useful tool for the analysis of general mechanisms of the diseases of calcium metabolism and for the design of clinical experiments aimed at characterizing these diseases. The model can also be the core of future autoadaptive extensions to be used in individual patients.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The QSP model used by FDA was built on two earlier published models: a model of systemic calcium homeostasis and a cellular model of the behavior of bone morphogenic units.
“This QSP model was built on two earlier published models: a model of systemic calcium homeostasis13 and a cellular model of the behavior of bone morphogenic units.14”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 67
- Authors
- Raposo, J. F., Sobrinho, L. G., & Ferreira, H. G.
- Affiliations
- Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil (PT)
- University of Lisbon (PT)
- Corresponding author
- Raposo, J. F.
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 4330-4340
- ISSN
- 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7197
- OpenAlex
- W2099098863
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Division of Electrical, Communications and Cyber Systems
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Vitamin D Research Studies
- Keywords
- calcium homeostasis, mathematical model, parathyroid hormone, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3, plasma calcium, bone, kidney, intestine, calcium infusion, chelating agents, chronic infusion, renal failure, hypocalcemia, hypercalcemia, calcium metabolism disorders
- MeSH terms
- Calcitriol, Calcium, Chelating Agents, Computer Simulation, Homeostasis, Humans, Hypocalcemia, Mathematics, Models, Biological, Organ Specificity, Parathyroid Hormone
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review