Cited by 137Ovarian function and disordersClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlHormonal and reproductive studies

The biological variation of testosterone and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) in polycystic ovarian syndrome: implications for SHBG as a surrogate marker of insulin resistance.

Jayagopal, V., Kilpatrick, E. S., Jennings, P. E., Hepburn, D. A., Atkin, S. L.·2003·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

This study was designed to assess the biological variability of total testosterone and SHBG in polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) and to determine the use of SHBG as a surrogate marker of insulin resistance in PCOS. Fasting blood samples were collected at 4-d intervals on 10 consecutive occasions from 12 PCOS patients and 11 age- and weight-matched controls. Duplicate samples were analyzed for SHBG, testosterone, and insulin in a single batch, and insulin resistance was calculated by the homeostasis model assessment method (HOMA-IR). The PCOS group had higher testosterone (mean +/- SD, 3.9 +/- 0.8 vs. 3.2 +/- 1.3 nmol/liter; P = 0.001), lower SHBG (28.6 +/- 17.1 vs. 57.6 +/- 30.2 nmol/liter; P = 0.001), and greater HOMA-IR (5.85 +/- 5.3 vs. 1.67 +/- 0.63 U; P = 0.001) than the controls. In contrast to HOMA-IR (1.09 vs. 0.48 U; P = 0.001), the intraindividual variation in SHBG was lower in the PCOS group (mean, 3.4 vs. 6.3 nmol/liter; P = 0.041). The index of individuality for SHBG and testosterone in PCOS was 0.49 and 0.69, respectively. This study shows that for patients with PCOS, SHBG is an integrated marker of insulin resistance that may be of use to identify insulin-resistant individuals for targeted treatment with insulin-sensitizing agents. However, SHBG and testosterone concentrations measured in isolation are inherently unsuitable for use as tests to detect hyperandrogenemia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2002-020557

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 137

Authors
Jayagopal, V., Kilpatrick, E. S., Jennings, P. E., Hepburn, D. A., & Atkin, S. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Hull (GB)
  • Hull Royal Infirmary (GB)
Corresponding author
Jayagopal, V.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2003-04
Volume
88
Issue
4
Pages
1528-1533
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2012781297
Cited by
137
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
7.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
Keywords
polycystic ovary syndrome, sex hormone-binding globulin, testosterone, insulin resistance, biological variation, within-person variability, HOMA-IR, surrogate markers, hyperandrogenemia, insulin sensitizers
MeSH terms
Adult, Fasting, Female, Homeostasis, Humans, Insulin, Insulin Resistance, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin, Testosterone, Biomarkers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review