The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prediction of Autoantibody Positivity and Progression to Type 1 Diabetes: Diabetes Autoimmunity Study in the Young (DAISY)
Abstract
Diabetes Autoimmunity Study in the Young (DAISY) has followed 1972 children for islet autoimmunity and diabetes: 837 first-degree relatives of persons with type 1 diabetes and 1135 general population newborns identified through human leukocyte antigen (HLA) screening. During follow-up of 4.06 yr (range, 0.17-9 yr), serial determination of autoantibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase, protein tyrosine phosphatase IA2, and insulin has generated approximately 20,000 results. Among 162 children with at least one positive autoantibody, in 31% the test was false positive (autoantibodies were negative twice on blinded duplicate aliquots), in 31% it was transiently positive (confirmed on blinded duplicate aliquots but negative on follow-up), and in 36% it was persistently positive. Using proportional hazards modeling, the HLA-DR3/4 DQ8 genotype, another positive autoantibody at the first positive visit, and level of autoantibody were predictive of persistent positivity. Only HLA-DR3/4 DQ8 genotype was predictive of progression to diabetes in proportional hazards modeling. This prospective study reveals that cross-sectional determination of islet autoantibodies in a population with relatively low previous probability of autoimmunity identifies as "positive" a large number of individuals who are either false or transiently positive. Predictive value of autoantibodies increases with blinded duplicate and independent sample retesting and incorporation of the level of autoantibody in the predictive algorithm.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rewers, M., Bugawan, T. L., Norris, J. M., Blair, A., Beaty, B., Hoffman, M., McDuffie, R. S., Hamman, R. F., Klingensmith, G., Eisenbarth, G. S., et al. (1996) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s001250050514 · Cited by 422
Self-citation
Cited by
Atkinson, M. A., Eisenbarth, G. S., & Michels, A. W. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60591-7 · Cited by 2,931
Self-citationYeung, W.-C. G., Rawlinson, W. D., & Craig, M. E. (2011) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.d35 · Cited by 511
Concannon, P., Rich, S. S., & Nepom, G. T. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra0808284 · Cited by 510
Self-antigen tetramers discriminate between myelin autoantibodies to native or denatured protein
O'Connor, K. C., McLaughlin, K. A., De Jager, P. L., Chitnis, T., Bettelli, E., Xu, C., Robinson, W. H., Cherry, S. V., Bar-Or, A., Banwell, B., et al. (2007) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm1488 · Cited by 416
Type 1 diabetes—early life origins and changing epidemiology
Norris, J. M., Johnson, R. K., & Stene, L. C. (2020) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(19)30412-7 · Cited by 367
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Barker, J. M., Barriga, K. J., Yu, L., Miao, D., Erlich, H. A., Norris, J. M., Eisenbarth, G. S., & Rewers, M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 2004-08
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3896-3902
- ISSN
- 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7197
- OpenAlex
- W2134686606
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prediction of Autoantibody Positivity and Progression to Type 1 Diabetes: Diabetes Autoimmunity Study in the Young (DAISY). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/jc.2003-031887
- The paper
- Barker, J. M., Barriga, K. J., Yu, L., Miao, D., Erlich, H. A., Norris, J. M., Eisenbarth, G. S., & Rewers, M. (2004). Prediction of Autoantibody Positivity and Progression to Type 1 Diabetes: Diabetes Autoimmunity Study in the Young (DAISY). The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2003-031887
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.