Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 310

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of Combination Estrogen Plus Progestin Hormone Treatment on Cognition and Affect

Resnick, Susan M., Maki, Pauline M., Rapp, Stephen R., Espeland, Mark A., Brunner, Robert, Coker, Laura H., Granek, Iris A., Hogan, Patricia, Ockene, Judith K., Shumaker, Sally A.·2006·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

Context: Some studies of hormone treatment in postmenopausal women suggest benefits on specific cognitive functions, particularly memory. Objective: The objective of this study was to determine whether hormone therapy influences changes in specific cognitive functions and affect in older women. Design: This study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Setting: Participants were women from 14 of 40 clinical centers of the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI). Participants: Postmenopausal women (1416) aged 65 yr and older, free of probable dementia, and enrolled in WHI and the WHI Memory Study (WHIMS) trial of combination estrogen and progestin for a mean of 3 yr and followed for a mean of 1.35 yr, were studied. Intervention: Intervention was conjugated equine estrogen (CEE; 0.625 mg) with 2.5 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) in one daily tablet (CEE + MPA) or placebo. Main Outcome Measures: Annual rates of change in specific cognitive functions and affect, adjusted for time since randomization, were measured. Results: CEE + MPA had a negative impact on verbal memory (P ≤ 0.01) and a trend to a positive impact on figural memory (P = 0.012) over time compared with placebo, but other cognitive domains were not affected. Both effects on memory were evident only after long-term therapy. CEE + MPA did not significantly influence positive affect, negative affect, or depressive symptoms. Conclusions: The effect of CEE + MPA on cognitive function varies across cognitive domains in older women, reflecting both possible beneficial and detrimental actions of ovarian steroids on the aging brain. Our results extend prior findings about dementia and global cognitive function to age-related changes in specific cognitive functions and suggest directions for future research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2005-2097

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Cited by

See all 310

Metadata

Authors
Resnick, S. M., Maki, P. M., Rapp, S. R., Espeland, M. A., Brunner, R., Coker, L. H., Granek, I. A., Hogan, P., Ockene, J. K., & Shumaker, S. A.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2006-05
Volume
91
Issue
5
Pages
1802-1810
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W1978061037
Cited by
310
References
41
FWCI
20.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Combination Estrogen Plus Progestin Hormone Treatment on Cognition and Affect. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/jc.2005-2097
The paper
Resnick, S. M., Maki, P. M., Rapp, S. R., Espeland, M. A., Brunner, R., Coker, L. H., Granek, I. A., Hogan, P., Ockene, J. K., & Shumaker, S. A. (2006). Effects of Combination Estrogen Plus Progestin Hormone Treatment on Cognition and Affect. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2005-2097

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.