Cited by 103Ovarian function and disordersAdrenal Hormones and DisordersSexual Differentiation and Disorders

Functional Significance of Polycystic-Size Ovaries in Healthy Adolescents

Mortensen, Monica, Rosenfield, Robert L., Littlejohn, Elizabeth·2006·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

Context: The relevance of adult polycystic ovary criteria to adolescence is unclear. Objective: The objective was to determine the functional significance of polycystic-size ovaries (PSO) in healthy adolescents. Design/Setting/Participants/Interventions: Healthy 11- to 18-yr-old postmenarcheal volunteers (n = 22) were recruited and divided into groups with normal size ovaries (VNSO; n = 10) or a polycystic-size ovary (VPSO; n = 12). They were secondarily compared with adolescents with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS; n = 8) matched for gynecological age and a PSO. All underwent GnRH agonist (GnRHag), oral glucose tolerance, and ACTH1–24 testing in our General Clinical Research Center. Results: VPSO had a higher peak 17-hydroxyprogesterone (17PROG) response to GnRHag than VNSO (146 ± 14 ng/dl, mean ± sem, vs. 85 ± 11; P = 0.008), as well as larger ovaries (13.3 ± 0.7 cc vs. 8.5 ± 0.8 cc). VPSO peak 17PROG was elevated (>137 ng/dl) in 42% (5 of 12). However, VPSO and VNSO androgen levels were similar, with the exception of one VPSO subject who had hyperandrogenemia and thus met criteria for PCOS. VPSO were similar to VNSO in LH, FSH, estradiol, and adrenal androgenic function. Although the VPSO group resembled the PCOS group in their 17PROG response to the GnRHag test, they differed in having significantly smaller ovaries and lower body mass index and in lacking evidence of peripheral androgen excess and of insulin resistance. Conclusion: A PSO in asymptomatic adolescents seems typically to be a normal variant. However, about half have a subclinical PCOS type of ovarian dysfunction; it is unknown whether this indicates a genetic carrier state or a risk for anovulation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2006-0835

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 103

Authors
Mortensen, M., Rosenfield, R. L., & Littlejohn, E.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2006-10-01
Volume
91
Issue
10
Pages
3786-3790
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2011800636
Cited by
103
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service (U54-041859)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR-00055)
  • NIH Clinical Center
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD-39267, R01HD039267)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
Keywords
polycystic ovary syndrome, adolescents, ovarian function, adrenal androgen production, hyperandrogenemia, insulin resistance, ovarian size, body mass index
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adrenocorticotropic Hormone, Child, Female, Humans, Insulin Resistance, Ovary, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Testosterone, Body Mass Index, Linear Models, 17-alpha-Hydroxyprogesterone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review