The DOI matches its Crossref record.
High Prevalence of Pituitary Adenomas: A Cross-Sectional Study in the Province of Liège, Belgium
Open accessAbstract
Context: Prevalence data are important for assessing the burden of disease on the health care system; data on pituitary adenoma prevalence are very scarce. Objective: The objective of the study was to measure the prevalence of clinically relevant pituitary adenomas in a well-defined population. Design: This was a cross-sectional, intensive, case-finding study performed in three regions of the province of Liège, Belgium, to measure pituitary adenoma prevalence as of September 30, 2005. Setting: The study was conducted in specialist and general medical practitioner patient populations, referral hospitals, and investigational centers. Methods: Three demographically and geographically distinct districts of the province of Liège were delineated precisely using postal codes. Medical practitioners in these districts were recruited, and patients with pituitary adenomas under their care were identified. Diagnoses were confirmed after retrieval of clinical, hormonal, radiological, and pathological data; full demographic and therapeutic follow-up data were collected in all cases. Results: Sixty-eight patients with clinically relevant pituitary adenomas were identified in a population of 71,972 individuals; the mean (± sd) prevalence was 94 ± 19.3 cases per 100,000 population (95% confidence interval, 72.2 to 115.8). The group was 67.6% female and had a mean age at diagnosis of 40.3 yr; 42.6% had macroadenomas and 55.9% underwent surgery. Prolactinomas comprised 66% of the group, with the rest having nonsecreting tumors (14.7%), somatotropinomas (13.2%), or Cushing’s disease (5.9%); 20.6% had hypopituitarism. Conclusion: The prevalence of pituitary adenomas in the study population (one case in 1064 individuals) was more than 3.5–5 times that previously reported. This increased prevalence may have important implications when prioritizing funding for research and treatment of pituitary adenomas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Diagnosis and treatment of hyperprolactinemia: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline
Melmed, S., Casanueva, F. F., Hoffman, A. R., Kleinberg, D. L., Montori, V. M., Schlechte, J. A., & Wass, J. A. H. (2011) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2010-1692 · Cited by 1,844
Diagnosis and Treatment of Pituitary Adenomas: A Review
Molitch, M. E. (2017) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2016.19699 · Cited by 933
Incidence of Pituitary Adenomas in Northern Finland in 1992–2007
Raappana, A., Koivukangas, J., Ebeling, T., & Pirilä, T. (2010) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2010-0537 · Cited by 470
Pathogenesis of pituitary tumors
Melmed, S. (2011) · Nature Reviews Endocrinology · doi:10.1038/nrendo.2011.40 · Cited by 466
Mortality in Patients with Pituitary Disease
Sherlock, M., Ayuk, J., Tomlinson, J. W., Toogood, A. A., Aragon-Alonso, A., Sheppard, M. C., Bates, A. S., & Stewart, P. M. (2010) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2009-0033 · Cited by 392
Metadata
- Authors
- Daly, A. F., Rixhon, M., Adam, C., Dempegioti, A., Tichomirowa, M. A., & Beckers, A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 2006-12-01
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 4769-4775
- ISSN
- 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7197
- OpenAlex
- W2132094049
- Cited by
- 1,025
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High Prevalence of Pituitary Adenomas: A Cross-Sectional Study in the Province of Liège, Belgium. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/jc.2006-1668
- The paper
- Daly, A. F., Rixhon, M., Adam, C., Dempegioti, A., Tichomirowa, M. A., & Beckers, A. (2006). High Prevalence of Pituitary Adenomas: A Cross-Sectional Study in the Province of Liège, Belgium. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2006-1668
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.