Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 531

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Prognostic Significance of Somatic RET Oncogene Mutations in Sporadic Medullary Thyroid Cancer: A 10-Year Follow-Up Study

Open access
Elisei, Rossella, Cosci, Barbara, Romei, Cristina, Bottici, Valeria, Renzini, Giulia, Molinaro, Eleonora, Agate, Laura, Vivaldi, Agnese, Faviana, Pinuccia, Basolo, Fulvio, Miccoli, Paolo, Berti, Piero, Pacini, Furio, Pinchera, Aldo·2008·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) is a well-differentiated thyroid tumor that maintains the typical features of C cells. An advanced stage and the presence of lymph node metastases at diagnosis have been demonstrated to be the most important bad prognostic factors. Somatic RET mutations have been found in 40-50% of MTCs. Although a relationship between somatic mutations and bad prognosis has been described, data are controversial and have been performed in small series with short-term follow ups. The aim of this study was to verify the prognostic value of somatic RET mutations in a large series of MTCs with a long follow up. METHODS: We studied 100 sporadic MTC patients with a 10.2 yr mean follow-up. RET gene exons 10-11 and 13-16 were analyzed. The correlation between the presence/absence of a somatic RET mutation, clinical/pathological features, and outcome of MTC patients was evaluated. RESULTS: A somatic RET mutation was found in 43 of 100 (43%) sporadic MTCs. The most frequent mutation (34 of 43, 79%) was M918T. RET mutation occurrence was more frequent in larger tumors (P=0.03), and in MTC with node and distant metastases (P<0.0001 and P=0.02, respectively), thus, a significant correlation was found with a more advanced stage at diagnosis (P=0.004). A worse outcome was also significantly correlated with the presence of a somatic RET mutation (P=0.002). Among all prognostic factors found to be correlated with a worse outcome, at multivariate analysis only the advanced stage at diagnosis and the presence of a RET mutation showed an independent correlation (P<0.0001 and P=0.01, respectively). Finally, the survival curves of MTC patients showed a significantly lower percentage of surviving patients in the group with RET mutations (P=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that the presence of a somatic RET mutation correlates with a worse outcome of MTC patients, not only for the highest probability to have persistence of the disease, but also for a lower survival rate in a long-term follow up. More interestingly, the presence of a somatic RET mutation correlates with the presence of lymph node metastases at diagnosis, which is a known bad prognostic factor for the definitive cure of MTC patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2007-1714

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 531

Metadata

Authors
Elisei, R., Cosci, B., Romei, C., Bottici, V., Renzini, G., Molinaro, E., Agate, L., Vivaldi, A., Faviana, P., Basolo, F., Miccoli, P., Berti, P., Pacini, F., & Pinchera, A.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2008-03-01
Volume
93
Issue
3
Pages
682-687
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2060543813
Cited by
531
References
0
FWCI
14.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognostic Significance of Somatic RET Oncogene Mutations in Sporadic Medullary Thyroid Cancer: A 10-Year Follow-Up Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/jc.2007-1714
The paper
Elisei, R., Cosci, B., Romei, C., Bottici, V., Renzini, G., Molinaro, E., Agate, L., Vivaldi, A., Faviana, P., Basolo, F., Miccoli, P., Berti, P., Pacini, F., & Pinchera, A. (2008). Prognostic Significance of Somatic RET Oncogene Mutations in Sporadic Medullary Thyroid Cancer: A 10-Year Follow-Up Study. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2007-1714

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.