Cited by 276Ovarian function and disordersDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsEndometriosis Research and Treatment

Comparison of single and combined treatment with exenatide and metformin on menstrual cyclicity in overweight women with polycystic ovary syndrome

Elkind-Hirsch, Karen, Marrioneaux, Ory, Bhushan, Madhu, Vernor, Denise, Bhushan, Rajat·2008·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

Context: Insulin resistance and obesity are common features of the polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Weight loss and use of insulin-lowering drugs have been shown to improve both reproductive and metabolic aspects of PCOS. Objective: We evaluated exenatide (EX) and metformin (MET), alone and in combination (COM), on menstrual cyclicity, hormonal parameters, metabolic profiles, and inflammatory markers in overweight, insulin-resistant women with PCOS. Design, Setting, and Participants: Sixty overweight oligoovulatory women with PCOS (body mass index > 27; 18–40 yr) were randomized to one of three treatment groups: MET [1000 mg twice daily (BID)], EX (10 μg BID), or COM (MET 1000 mg BID, EX 10 μg BID) for 24 wk. The primary outcome was menstrual frequency; secondary outcome measures included changes in ovulation rate, insulin action, anthropometric measures, androgen levels, and inflammatory markers. Results: Forty-two (70%) patients completed the study. COM therapy was superior to EX or MET monotherapy in improving menstrual cyclicity, ovulation rate, free androgen index, and insulin sensitivity measures and reducing weight and abdominal fat. Both EX arms were more effective in promoting weight loss than MET (P = 0.003). Conclusions: COM appears better than either EX or MET alone on menstrual cycle frequency and hormonal and metabolic derangements. A marked decrease in central adiposity could partly explain the improvements in reproductive function, insulin-glucose parameters, and adiponectin observed in these overweight women with PCOS treated with COM therapy. Larger trials of longer duration are warranted to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of combined EX-MET therapy in overweight women with PCOS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2008-0115

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In non-diabetic obesity studies, EX produced weight loss of 5.1 kg in 152 simple obesity cases, 3.2-6.0 kg in 60 PCOS cases, and 3.7 kg in 10 metabolic syndrome cases, with vomiting as most common adverse reaction.

    “At present, the studies of EX on non-diabetic obesity mainly include 152 cases of simple obesity (weight loss of 5.1 kg) (54), 60 cases of polycystic ovary syndrome (weight loss of 3.2-6.0 kg) (55), and 10 cases of metabolic syndrome (weight loss of 3.7 kg) (56), among which the most common adverse reaction is still vomiting.”
  • The combination of GLP-1 RA and metformin seems superior to each single-agent alone for improving BMI, central adiposity, insulin resistance, menstrual cycles, and hyperandrogenism, especially in obese PCOS patients.

    “The combination of GLP-1 RA and metformin seems to be superior to each single-agent alone, for improving not only BMI, central adiposity, and insulin resistance, but also menstrual cycles and hyperandrogenism, especially in obese PCOS patients [57,58].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 276

Authors
Elkind-Hirsch, K., Marrioneaux, O., Bhushan, M., Vernor, D., & Bhushan, R.
Affiliations
  • Woman’s Health Research Institute (K.E.-H.), Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70815
  • Woman's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Elkind-Hirsch, Karen
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2008-07-01
Volume
93
Issue
7
Pages
2670-2678
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2009155872
Cited by
276
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 12
FWCI
10.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Amylin Pharmaceuticals
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Sanofi
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
Keywords
polycystic ovary syndrome, exenatide, metformin, combination therapy, menstrual cyclicity, ovulation rate, insulin resistance, insulin sensitivity, androgen levels, free androgen index, weight loss, abdominal fat, adiponectin, inflammatory markers, overweight women, oligoovulation
MeSH terms
Exenatide, Adult, Body Weight, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Humans, Lipids, Menstruation, Metformin, Peptides, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin, Venoms, Overweight, Adiponectin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review