Secular Trends in the Presentation and Management of Functioning Insulinoma at the Mayo Clinic, 1987–2007
Abstract
Objective The objective of the study was to assess changes in the presentation and diagnostic and radiological evaluation of patients with surgically confirmed insulinoma at the Mayo Clinic 1987-2007. Methods A retrospective analysis of patients with insulinoma was conducted. Patients with prior gastric bypass were excluded. Results A total of 237 patients [135 women (57%)] were identified. Hypoglycemia was reported solely in the fasting state in 73%, the fasting and postprandial state in 21%, and exclusively postprandially in 6%. There was a predominance of men in the postprandial symptom group. Considering the period of study by quartile, outpatient evaluation increased from 35 to 83% and successful preoperative localization improved from 74 to 100% comparing the first to the fourth quartiles. Although the rates of localization by noninvasive techniques remained static at approximately 75%, the addition of invasive modalities has resulted in successful preoperative localization in all patients in the past 10 yr. The sensitivity and specificity of the established diagnostic criteria using insulin, C-peptide, proinsulin, beta-hydroxybutyrate, and glucose response to iv glucagon were greater than 90% and greater than 70%, respectively. Conclusions Although fasting hypoglycemia is characteristic of patients with insulinoma, postprandial symptoms have been reported with increasing, albeit low, frequency. Trends in the evaluation and preoperative management include a shift to out…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The sensitivity of the 72-hour fast is close to the reported 100%.
“Obviously, no major pathology was missed, and the sensitivity of the 72-hour fast is close to the reported 100% [37].”
From Spontaneous hypoglycemia: should we mind the gap? Long-term follow-up of healthy people who met Whipple’s triad criteria (2024) · cites this paper as [37]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 15 · Cited by 360
- Authors
- Placzkowski, K. A., Vella, A., Thompson, G. B., Grant, C. S., Reading, C. C., Charboneau, J. W., Andrews, J. C., Lloyd, R. V., & Service, F. J.
- Affiliations
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Corresponding author
- Service, F. John
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 2009-04-01
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1069-1073
- ISSN
- 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7197
- OpenAlex
- W2059424770
- Cited by
- 360
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 10.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- insulinoma, hypoglycemia, postprandial hypoglycemia, fasting hypoglycemia, preoperative localization, pancreatic tumor localization, diagnostic criteria, glucagon stimulation test, C-peptide, proinsulin, beta-hydroxybutyrate, hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia, surgical management, temporal trends
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Blood Glucose, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Inpatients, Insulinoma, Male, Medical Records, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Invasiveness, Outpatients, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Retrospective Studies, Postprandial Period, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review