The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of Teriparatide, Alendronate, or Both in Women with Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
Open accessAbstract
CONTEXT: Teriparatide increases both bone formation and bone resorption. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether combining teriparatide with an antiresorptive agent would alter its anabolic action. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a randomized controlled trial conducted in a single university hospital. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION: We randomized 93 postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density (BMD) to alendronate 10 mg daily (group 1), teriparatide 40 microg sc daily (group 2), or both (group 3) for 30 months. Teriparatide was begun at month 6. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: BMD of the lumbar spine, proximal femur, proximal radius, and total body was measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) every 6 months. Lumbar spine trabecular BMD was measured at baseline and month 30 by quantitative computed tomography. Serum osteocalcin, N-terminal propeptide of type 1 collagen, and N-telopeptide levels were assessed frequently. Women who had at least one repeat DXA scan on therapy were included in the analyses (n = 69). RESULTS: DXA spine BMD increased more in women treated with teriparatide alone than with alendronate alone (18 +/- 11 vs. 7 +/- 4%; P < 0.001) or both (18+/-11 vs. 12 +/- 9%; P = 0.045). Similarly, femoral neck BMD increased more in women treated with teriparatide alone than with alendronate alone (11 +/- 5 vs. 4 +/- 4%; P < 0.001) or both (11 +/- 5 vs. 3 +/- 5%; P < 0.001). Quantitative computed tomography spine BMD increased 1 +/- 7, 61 +/- 31, and 24 +/- 24% in groups 1, 2, and 3 (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). Serum osteocalcin, N-terminal propeptide of type 1 collagen, and cross-linked N-telopeptides of type I collagen increased more with teriparatide alone than with both (P < 0.001 for each marker). CONCLUSION: Alendronate reduces the ability of teriparatide to increase BMD and bone turnover in women.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neer, R. M., Arnaud, C. D., Zanchetta, J. R., Prince, R., Gaich, G. A., Reginster, J.-Y., Hodsman, A. B., Eriksen, E. F., Ish-Shalom, S., Genant, H. K., et al. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200105103441904 · Cited by 4,602
Self-citation
Cited by
Osteoporosis: current concepts
Akkawi, I., & Zmerly, H. (2018) · Joints · doi:10.1055/s-0038-1660790 · Cited by 368
The clinical utility of bone marker measurements in osteoporosis
Wheater, G., Elshahaly, M., Tuck, S. P., Datta, H. K., & van Laar, J. M. (2013) · Journal of Translational Medicine · doi:10.1186/1479-5876-11-201 · Cited by 322
Glüer, C.-C., Marin, F., Ringe, J. D., Hawkins, F., Möricke, R., Papaioannu, N., Farahmand, P., Minisola, S., Martínez, G., Nolla, J. M., et al. (2013) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1002/jbmr.1870 · Cited by 171
Decline in calcitonin receptor expression in osteocytes with age
Gooi, J. H., Chia, L. Y., Walsh, N. C., Karsdal, M. A., Quinn, J. M. W., Martin, T. J., & Sims, N. A. (2014) · Journal of Endocrinology · doi:10.1530/joe-13-0524 · Cited by 22
Bakr, M. M., Kelly, W. L., Brunt, A. R., Paterson, B. C., Massa, H. M., Morrison, N. A., & Forwood, M. R. (2020) · JBMR Plus · doi:10.1002/jbm4.10387 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Finkelstein, J. S., Wyland, J. J., Lee, H., & Neer, R. M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 2010-04-01
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1838-1845
- ISSN
- 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7197
- OpenAlex
- W2103502150
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 19.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.