The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Shear Wave Elastography: A New Ultrasound Imaging Mode for the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Thyroid Nodules
Abstract
CONTEXT: Elastography uses ultrasound (US) to assess elasticity. Shear wave elastography (SWE) is a new technique that estimates tissue stiffness in real time and is quantitative and user independent. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to assess the efficiency of SWE in predicting malignancy and to compare SWE with US. DESIGN: Ninety-three patients and 39 control subjects were included in the study. Predictive value of SWE was assessed by correlation between elasticity, US parameters, and histology. Elasticity index (EI) was first analyzed alone. Scores have been constructed with echographic parameters, i.e. vascularity, hypoechogenicity, and microcalcifications (Score 1=US Score), and with the same parameters plus EI (Score 2=US+SWE Score). For statistical analysis, univariate and multivariate analysis and receiver operating characteristic curves were used. RESULTS: A total of 146 nodules from 93 patients were analyzed. Twenty-nine nodules (19.9%) were malignant. Mean (±sd) EI was 150±95 kPa (range, 30-356) in malignant nodules vs. 36±30 (range, 0-200) kPa in benign nodules (P<0.001, Student's t test). For a positive predictive value of at least 80%, characteristics of tissue elasticity (cutoff, 65 kPa) were: sensitivity=85.2%, and specificity=93.9%. Characteristics of the US Score were: sensitivity=51.9% [95% confidence interval (CI), 33.1; 70.7], and specificity=97% (95% CI, 93.6; 1). Characteristics of the US+SWE Score were: sensitivity=81.5% (95% CI, 66.9; 96.1), and specificity=97.0% (95% CI, 93.6; 1). CONCLUSION: Promising results have been obtained with SWE. This technique may be applied to multinodular goiters. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these results and to define the respective places of SWE, US, and FNA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DeLong, E. R., DeLong, D. M., & Clarke-Pearson, D. L. (1988) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531595 · Cited by 22,649
Cited by
Spatial variations in Achilles tendon shear wave speed
DeWall, R. J., Slane, L. C., Lee, K. S., & Thelen, D. G. (2014) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.05.008 · Cited by 105
Elastography imaging: the 30 year perspective
Ormachea, J., & Parker, K. J. (2020) · Physics in Medicine & Biology · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/abca00 · Cited by 104
Deep learning in ultrasound elastography imaging: A review
Li, H., Bhatt, M., Qu, Z., Zhang, S., Hartel, M. C., Khademhosseini, A., & Cloutier, G. (2022) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/mp.15856 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Sebag, F., Vaillant-Lombard, J., Berbis, J., Griset, V., Henry, J. F., Petit, P., & Oliver, C.
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 2010-12
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 5281-5288
- ISSN
- 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7197
- OpenAlex
- W2142526839
- Cited by
- 424
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.