The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ultrasound Sensitivity for Thyroid Malignancy Is Increased by Real-Time Elastography: A Prospective Multicenter Study
Abstract
CONTEXT: Thyroid nodules are selected for biopsy on the basis of clinical and ultrasound (US) findings. Ultrasonography detects nodules at risk of malignancy, but its diagnostic accuracy does not rule out with certainty the possibility of cancer in lesions without suspicious findings. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of real-time elastography (RTE) in thyroid nodules and to assess the improvement provided by combination of RTE, B-mode US, and color flow Doppler (CFD). DESIGN: This was a prospective multicenter study. PATIENTS: A consecutive series of 498 thyroid nodules was blindly evaluated by US, CFD, and RTE before biopsy or surgery. Nodules were classified at RTE by four-class color scale. Patients with benign cytology underwent follow-up over 12 months, whereas patients with indeterminate, suspicious, or malignant cytology were surgically treated. RESULTS: At follow-up, 126 nodules were malignant and 372 benign. RTE classes III-IV showed 81% sensitivity and 62% specificity. The presence of at least one US risk factor (hypoechogenicity, microcalcifications, irregular margins, intranodular vascularization, and taller than wide shape) had 85% sensitivity and 91% negative predictive value. When RTE was combined with US, the presence of at least one of the six parameters had 97% sensitivity and 97% negative predictive value, with an odds ratio of 15.8 (95% confidence interval 5.7-43.8). CONCLUSIONS: RTE is a valuable tool for detecting malignant thyroid lesions with a sensitivity similar to traditional US and CFD features. By adding RTE evaluation, the sensitivity for malignancy of US findings is markedly increased and the selection of nodules that do not need cytology is made more reliable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Haugen, B. R., Alexander, E. K., Bible, K. C., Doherty, G. M., Mandel, S. J., Nikiforov, Y. E., Pacini, F., Randolph, G. W., Sawka, A. M., Schlumberger, M., et al. (2016) · Thyroid® · doi:10.1089/thy.2015.0020 · Cited by 16,535
Cited by
Remonti, L. R., Kramer, C. K., Leitão, C. B., Pinto, L. C. F., & Gross, J. L. (2015) · Thyroid · doi:10.1089/thy.2014.0353 · Cited by 411
Metadata
- Authors
- Trimboli, P., Guglielmi, R., Monti, S., Misischi, I., Graziano, F., Nasrollah, N., Amendola, S., Morgante, S. N., Deiana, M. G., Valabrega, S., Toscano, V., & Papini, E.
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 2012-12-01
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 4524-4530
- ISSN
- 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7197
- OpenAlex
- W2066979337
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ultrasound Sensitivity for Thyroid Malignancy Is Increased by Real-Time Elastography: A Prospective Multicenter Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/jc.2012-2951
- The paper
- Trimboli, P., Guglielmi, R., Monti, S., Misischi, I., Graziano, F., Nasrollah, N., Amendola, S., Morgante, S. N., Deiana, M. G., Valabrega, S., Toscano, V., & Papini, E. (2012). Ultrasound Sensitivity for Thyroid Malignancy Is Increased by Real-Time Elastography: A Prospective Multicenter Study. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2012-2951
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.