Cited by 83Thyroid Disorders and TreatmentsPharmaceutical Economics and PolicyBiosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods

Generic and Brand-Name l -Thyroxine Are Not Bioequivalent for Children With Severe Congenital Hypothyroidism

Open access
Carswell, Jeremi M., Gordon, Joshua H., Popovsky, Erica, Hale, Andrea, Brown, Rosalind S.·2013·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

CONTEXT: In the United States, generic substitution of levothyroxine (L-T(4)) by pharmacists is permitted if the formulations are deemed to be bioequivalent by the Federal Drug Administration, but there is widespread concern that the pharmacokinetic standard used is too insensitive. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the bioequivalence of a brand-name L-T(4) (Synthroid) and an AB-rated generic formulation (Sandoz, Princeton, NJ) in children with severe hypothyroidism. DESIGN: This was a prospective randomized crossover study in which patients received 8 weeks of one L-T(4) formulation followed by 8 weeks of the other. SETTING: The setting was an academic medical center. PATIENTS: Of 31 children with an initial serum TSH concentration >100 mU/L, 20 had congenital hypothyroidism (CH), and 11 had autoimmune thyroiditis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was the serum TSH concentration. Secondary endpoints were the free T(4) and total T(3) concentrations. RESULTS: The serum TSH concentration was significantly lower after 8 weeks of Synthroid than after generic drug (P = .002), but thyroid hormone levels did not differ significantly. Subgroup analysis revealed that the difference in TSH was restricted to patients with CH (P = .0005). Patients with CH required a higher L-T(4) dose (P < .0004) and were younger (P = .003) but were not resistant to thyroid hormone; 15 of 16 CH patients had severe thyroid dysgenesis or agenesis on imaging. The response to generic vs brand-name preparation remained significant when adjusted for age. CONCLUSIONS: Synthroid and an AB-rated generic L-T(4) are not bioequivalent for patients with severe hypothyroidism due to CH, probably because of diminished thyroid reserve. It would therefore seem prudent not to substitute L-T(4) formulations in patients with severe CH, particularly in those <3 yr of age. Our results may have important implications for other severely hypothyroid patients in whom precise titration of L-T(4) is necessary.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2012-3125

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A recent prospective cross-over trial in children treated for congenital hypothyroidism showed that similar doses of a branded LT4 product and an FDA-interchangeable generic resulted in significantly different TSH values.

    “a recent prospective, cross-over trial, conducted in the pediatric population, showed that similar doses of a branded product and a generic considered by the FDA to be interchangeable resulted in significantly different TSH values in children being treated for CH (107).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 83

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [2]2. Brown RS. The Thyroid. In: Brook CGD, Clayton PE, Brown RS, eds. Brook's Clinical Pediatric Endocrinology. 6th ed Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009:250–282 [Google Scholar]
  2. [24]24. American Thyroid Association; Endocrine Society; American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Joint statement on the U. S. Food and Drug Administration's decision regarding bioequivalence of levothyroxine sodium. Thyroid. 2004;14:486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Authors
Carswell, J. M., Gordon, J. H., Popovsky, E., Hale, A., & Brown, R. S.
Affiliations
Boston Children's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Brown, Rosalind S.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2013-02
Volume
98
Issue
2
Pages
610-617
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W1988927270
Cited by
83
References
41
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5
FWCI
4.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Harvard University
  • Harvard Catalyst
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (T32DK007699)
  • National Center for Research Resources (MO1 RR-02172, UL1RR025758, M01RR002172)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
Keywords
levothyroxine, bioequivalence, generic substitution, congenital hypothyroidism, children, thyroid-stimulating hormone, thyroid hormone replacement, autoimmune thyroiditis, dose titration, Sandoz
MeSH terms
Child, Child, Preschool, Congenital Hypothyroidism, Female, Humans, Male, Severity of Illness Index, Therapeutic Equivalency, Thyrotropin, Thyroxine, Triiodothyronine, Drugs, Generic, Treatment Outcome, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review