Perspectives in polycystic ovary syndrome: From hair to eternity
Open accessAbstract
CONTEXT: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common complex genetic disease. It is characterized by hyperandrogenism, gonadotropin secretory changes, polycystic ovarian morphology, and insulin resistance. The etiology of PCOS remains unknown, but modern genetic approaches, such as genome-wide association studies (GWAS), Mendelian randomization, and next-generation sequencing, promise to identify the pathways that are primarily disrupted. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: The literature on PCOS, including the author's research, is discussed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Recent genetic analyses are reviewed. CONCLUSIONS: Considerable progress has been made mapping PCOS susceptibility genes. GWAS have implicated gonadotropin secretion and action as important primary defects in disease pathogenesis in European and Han Chinese PCOS cohorts, respectively. European women with the National Institutes of Health and Rotterdam phenotypes as well as those with self-reported PCOS have some gene regions in common, such as chromosome 11p14.1 region containing the FSH B polypeptide (FSHB) gene, suggesting shared genetic susceptibility. Several chromosomal signals are significant in both Han Chinese and European PCOS cohorts, suggesting that the susceptibility genes in these regions are evolutionarily conserved. In addition, GWAS have suggested that DENND1A, epidermal growth factor signaling, and DNA repair pathways play a role in PCOS pathogenesis. Only a small amount of the heritability of PCOS is accounted for by the common susceptibility variants mapped so far. Future studies should clarify the contribution of rare genetic variants and epigenetic factors to the PCOS phenotype. Furthermore, Mendelian randomization can be used to clarify causal relationships, and phenome-wide association studies can provide insight into health risks associated with PCOS susceptibility variants.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cytogenetic studies failed to identify karyotypic abnormalities and genetic studies did not show a monogenic inheritance pattern following examination of candidate genes.
“Cytogenetic studies failed to identify karyotypic abnormalities and genetic studies did not show a monogenic inheritance pattern following examination of candidate genes [81,82].”
From Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: An Evolutionary Adaptation to Lifestyle and the Environment (2022) · cites this paper as [81]
Finding the same signals (THADA, YAP1 and c9orf3) in Chinese and European populations suggests that PCOS is an ancient trait that was present before humans migrated out of Africa.
“In addition to identifying common gene variants for PCOS phenotypes, finding the same signals (THADA, YAP1 and c9orf3) in Chinese and European populations suggests that PCOS is an ancient trait that was present before humans migrated out of Africa [81].”
From Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: An Evolutionary Adaptation to Lifestyle and the Environment (2022) · cites this paper as [81]
Two or more PCOS phenotypes can be present in the same family, suggesting that some of the phenotypic differences could be accounted for by variable expression of the same shared genes.
“In addition, two or more phenotypes can be present in the same family suggesting that some of the phenotypic differences could be accounted for by variable expression of the same shared genes [81,83].”
From Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: An Evolutionary Adaptation to Lifestyle and the Environment (2022) · cites this paper as [81]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 126 · Cited by 87
- Authors
- Dunaif, A.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dunaif, Andrea
- ORCID
- Dunaif, Andrea
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 2016-03
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 759-768
- ISSN
- 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7197
- PMC
- PMC4803161
- OpenAlex
- W2284590551
- Cited by
- 87
- References
- 126
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4
- FWCI
- 18.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P50HD044405)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
- Keywords
- polycystic ovary syndrome, genetic susceptibility, genome-wide association study, gonadotropin secretion, insulin resistance, hyperandrogenism, DENND1A, EGF signaling, DNA repair pathways, Han Chinese, European women, heritability, rare variants, epigenetics, Mendelian randomization, phenome-wide association study
- MeSH terms
- Female, Haplotypes, Humans, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Epigenesis, Genetic, Genome-Wide Association Study
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review