Cited by 87Endometriosis Research and TreatmentMicroRNA in disease regulationReproductive System and Pregnancy

Progesterone resistance in endometriosis is modulated by the altered expression of microRNA-29c and FKBP4

Open access
Joshi, Niraj R, Miyadahira, Eduardo H, Afshar, Yalda, Jeong, Jae-Wook, Young, Steven L, Lessey, Bruce A, Serafini, Paulo C, Fazleabas, Asgerally T·2016·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

Context: Endometriosis results in aberrant gene expression in the eutopic endometrium (EuE) and subsequent progesterone resistance. MicroRNA (miR) microarray data in a baboon model of endometriosis showed an increased expression of miR-29c. Objectives: To explore the role of miR-29c in progesterone resistance in a subset of women with endometriosis. Design: MiR-29c expression was analyzed in the endometrium of baboons and women with or without endometriosis. The role in progesterone resistance and decidualization was analyzed by transfecting human uterine fibroblast cells with miR-29c. Patients: Subjects diagnosed with deep infiltrative endometriosis (DIE) by transvaginal ultrasound with bowel preparation underwent surgical excision of endometriosis. Eutopic secretory endometrium was collected pre- and postoperatively. Women with normal EuE and without DIE served as controls. Results: Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction demonstrated that miR-29c expression increased, while the transcript levels of its target, FK506-binding protein 4 (FKBP4), decreased in the EuE of baboons following the induction of endometriosis. FKBP4 messenger RNA and decidual markers were statistically significantly decreased in decidualized human uterine fibroblast cells transfected with a miR-29c mimic compared with controls. Human data corroborated our baboon data and demonstrated higher expression of miR-29c in endometriosis EuE compared with normal EuE. MiR-29c was significantly decreased in endometriosis EuE postoperatively compared with preoperative tissues, and FKBP4 showed an inverse trend following radical laparoscopic resection surgery. Conclusions: We demonstrate that miR-29c expression is increased in EuE of baboons and women with endometriosis, which might contribute to a compromised progesterone response by diminishing the levels of FKBP4. Resection of DIE is likely to reverse the progesterone resistance associated with endometriosis in women.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2016-2076

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Joshi et al. demonstrated in a nonhuman primate model of endometriosis the functional implication of increased expression of miR-29c in endometrial progesterone resistance.

    “In addition, Joshi et al. recently demonstrated, in a nonhuman primate model of endometriosis, the functional implication of increased expression of miR-29c in endometrial progesterone resistance (108).”

    From Biomarkers in endometriosis: Challenges and opportunities (2017) · cites this paper as [108]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 55 · Cited by 87

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Giudice LC. Clinical practice: endometriosis. N Engl J Med. 2010; 362(25):2389-2398.
  2. Bulun SE. Endometriosis. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(3):268-279.

Authors
Joshi, N. R., Miyadahira, E. H., Afshar, Y., Jeong, J.-W., Young, S. L., Lessey, B. A., Serafini, P. C., & Fazleabas, A. T.
Affiliations
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Prisma Health (US)
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2016-10-25
Volume
102
Issue
1
Pages
jc.2016-2076
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2534032587
Cited by
87
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
9.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • Michigan State University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • College of Engineering, Michigan State University
  • College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD067721, R01HD083273)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › MicroRNA in disease regulation
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
Keywords
endometriosis, progesterone resistance, microRNA-29c, FKBP4, eutopic endometrium, decidualization, deep infiltrating endometriosis, baboon model, laparoscopic resection, progesterone response
MeSH terms
Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Endometriosis, Endometrium, Female, Humans, Papio, Progesterone, Prognosis, Uterine Diseases, Biomarkers, Case-Control Studies, Tacrolimus Binding Proteins, MicroRNAs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review