Pioglitazone and Risk for Bone Fracture: Safety Data from a Randomized Clinical Trial
Open accessAbstract
Context: Pioglitazone reduces cardiovascular risk in nondiabetic patients after an ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) but is associated with increased risk for bone fracture. Objective: To characterize fractures associated with pioglitazone by location, mechanism, severity, timing, and sex. Design, Setting, and Patients: Patients were 3876 nondiabetic participants in the Insulin Resistance Intervention after Stroke trial randomized to pioglitazone or placebo and followed for a median of 4.8 years. Fractures were identified through quarterly interviews. Results: At 5 years, the increment in fracture risk between pioglitazone and placebo groups was 4.9% [13.6% vs 8.8%; hazard ratio (HR), 1.53; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.24 to 1.89). In each group, ∼80% of fractures were low energy (i.e., resulted from fall) and 45% were serious (i.e., required surgery or hospitalization). For serious fractures most likely to be related to pioglitazone (low energy, nonpathological), the risk increment was 1.6% (4.7% vs 3.1%; HR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.03 to 2.09). Increased risk for any fracture was observed in men (9.4% vs 5.2%; HR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.36 to 2.48) and women (14.9% vs 11.6%; HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 0.98 to 1.78; interaction P = 0.13). Conclusions: Fractures affected 8.8% of placebo-treated patients within 5 years after an ischemic stroke or TIA. Pioglitazone increased the absolute fracture risk by 1.6% to 4.9% and the relative risk by 47% to 60%, depending on fracture classification. Our analysis suggests that treatments to improve bone health and prevent falls may help optimize the risk/benefit ratio for pioglitazone.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
TZDs are associated with possible side effects of fluid retention and congestive heart failure, weight gain, and bone fracture.
“However, these bene fi ts must be balanced against possible side effects of fl uid retention and congestive HF (196,197,202), weight gain (196 -198,202,203), and bone fracture (204,205).”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 124
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- [5]5. doi: 10.1007/s00125-015-3660-2. Billington E, Grey A, Bolland M. The effect of thiazolidinediones on bone mineral density and bone turnover: systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetologia. 2015;58(10):2238–2246. doi:10.1007/s00125-015-3660-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
- [8]8. Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America. Observation of an increased incidence of fractures in female patients who received long-term treatment with ACTOS tablets for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Dear Healthcare Provider Letter. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Safety/MedWatch/SafetyInformation/SafetyAlertsforHumanMedicalProducts/UCM153896.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2007. [Google Scholar] 9.Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53:457–481. [Google Scholar] 10.Cox DR. Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Soc (Ser A). 1972;34:187–202. [Google Scholar] 11.Dormandy JA, Charbonnel B, Eckland DJ, Erdmann E, Massi-Benedetti M, Moules IK, Skene AM, Tan MH, Lefèbvre PJ, Murray GD, Standl E, Wilcox RG, Wilhelmsen L, Betteridge J, Birkeland K, Golay A, Heine RJ, Korányi L, Laakso M, Mokán M, Norkus A, Pirags V, Podar T, Scheen A, Scherbaum W, Schernthaner G, Schmitz O, Skrha J, Smith U, Taton J; PROactive Investigators . Secondary prevention of macrovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes in the PROactive study (PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;366(9493):1279–1289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 12.Ramnemark A, Nyberg L, Borssén B, Olsson T, Gustafson Y. Fractures after stroke. Osteoporos Int. 1998;8(1):92–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13]13. doi: 10.1161/01.str.32.3.702. Kanis J, Oden A, Johnell O. Acute and long-term increase in fracture risk after hospitalization for stroke. Stroke. 2001;32(3):702–706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 14.Dennis MS, Lo KM, McDowall M, West T. Fractures after stroke: frequency, types, and associations. Stroke. 2002;33(3):728–734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 15.Benzinger P, Rapp K, König HH, Bleibler F, Globas C, Beyersmann J, Jaensch A, Becker C, Büchele G. Risk of osteoporotic fractures following stroke in older persons. Osteoporos Int. 2015;26(4):1341–1349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 16.Meier C, Schwartz AV, Egger A, Lecka-Czernik B. Effects of diabetes drugs on the skeleton. Bone. 2016;82:93–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 17.Grey A. Skeletal consequences of thiazolidinedione therapy. Osteoporos Int. 2008;19(2):129–137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 18.Lecka-Czernik B, Moerman EJ, Grant DF, Lehmann JM, Manolagas SC, Jilka RL. Divergent effects of selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ2 ligands on adipocyte versus osteoblast differentiation. Endocrinology. 2002;143(6):2376–2384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 19.Wei W, Zeve D, Wang X, Du Y, Tang W, Dechow PC, Graff JM, Wan Y. Osteoclast progenitors reside in the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ-expressing bone marrow cell population. Mol Cell Biol. 2011;31(23):4692–4705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 20.Grey A, Bolland M, Gamble G, Wattie D, Horne A, Davidson J, Reid IR. The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ agonist rosiglitazone decreases bone formation and bone mineral density in healthy postmenopausal women: a randomized, controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(4):1305–1310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [21]21. doi: 10.1210/jc.2007-0431. Berberoglu Z, Gursoy A, Bayraktar N, Yazici A, Bascil Tutuncu N, Guvener Demirag N. Rosiglitazone decreases serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase activity in postmenopausal diabetic women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(9):3523–3530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 22.Glintborg D, Andersen M, Hagen C, Heickendorff L, Hermann AP. Association of pioglitazone treatment with decreased bone mineral density in obese premenopausal patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(5):1696–1701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 23.Berberoglu Z, Yazici AC, Demirag NG. Effects of rosiglitazone on bone mineral density and remodelling parameters in postmenopausal diabetic women: a 2-year follow-up study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2010;73(3):305–312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 24.Borges J, Bilezikian J, Jones-Leone A, Acusta A, Ambery P, Nino A, Grosse M, Fitzpatrick L, Cobitz A. A randomized, parallel group, double-blind, multicentre study comparing the efficacy and safety of Avandamet (rosiglitazone/metformin) and metformin on long-term glycaemic control and bone mineral density after 80 weeks of treatment in drug-naive type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. DiabetesObes Metab. 2011;13(11):1036–1046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [25]25. doi: 10.1530/EJE-11-1061. van Lierop A, Hamdy N, van der Meer R, Jonker J, Lamb H, Rijzewijk L, Diamant M, Romijn J, Smit J, Papapoulos S. Distinct effects of pioglitazone and metformin on circulating sclerostin and biochemical markers of bone turnover in men with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Eur J Endocrinol. 2012;166(4):711–716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 26.Bilezikian JP, Josse RG, Eastell R, Lewiecki EM, Miller CG, Wooddell M, Northcutt AR, Kravitz BG, Paul G, Cobitz AR, Nino AJ, Fitzpatrick LA. Rosiglitazone decreases bone mineral density and increases bone turnover in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(4):1519–1528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [27]27. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-2077. Harsløf T, Wamberg L, Møller L, Stødkilde-Jørgensen H, Ringgaard S, Pedersen S, Langdahl B. Rosiglitazone decreases bone mass and bone marrow fat. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(5):1541–1548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [28]28. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-4096. Bone H, Lindsay R, McClung M, Perez A, Raanan M, Spanheimer R. Effects of pioglitazone on bone in postmenopausal women with impaired fasting glucose or impaired glucose tolerance: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(12):4691–4701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
- [29]29. doi: 10.1530/EJE-13-0793. Grey A, Bolland M, Fenwick S, Horne A, Gamble G, Drury P, Reid I. The skeletal effects of pioglitazone in type 2 diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Endocrinol. 2013;170(2):255–262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 30.Sorocéanu MA, Miao D, Bai X-Y, Su H, Goltzman D, Karaplis AC. Rosiglitazone impacts negatively on bone by promoting osteoblast/osteocyte apoptosis. J Endocrinol. 2004;183(1):203–216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 31.Tatsumi S, Ishii K, Amizuka N, Li M, Kobayashi T, Kohno K, Ito M, Takeshita S, Ikeda K. Targeted ablation of osteocytes induces osteoporosis with defective mechanotransduction. Cell Metab. 2007;5(6):464–475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Articles from The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism are provided here courtesy of The Endocrine Society · DOI · Paper page
- Authors
- Viscoli, C. M., Inzucchi, S. E., Young, L. H., Insogna, K. L., Conwit, R., Furie, K. L., Gorman, M., Kelly, M. A., Lovejoy, A. M., Kernan, W. N., & for the IRIS Trial Investigators
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (US)
- Brown University (US)
- Maine Medical Center (US)
- Cook County Health and Hospitals System (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 2016-12-09
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- jc.2016-3237
- ISSN
- 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7197
- PMC
- PMC5460686
- OpenAlex
- W2560143854
- Cited by
- 124
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 13.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U01NS044876)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
- Keywords
- pioglitazone, bone fracture risk, insulin resistance, ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, non-diabetic patients, sex differences, fragility fractures, fall-related fractures, drug safety
- MeSH terms
- Accidental Falls, Pioglitazone, Aged, Ischemic Attack, Transient, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin Resistance, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Proportional Hazards Models, Stroke, Thiazolidinediones, Fractures, Bone, Kaplan-Meier Estimate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review