Cited by 88Regulation of Appetite and ObesityBariatric Surgery and OutcomesPharmacology and Obesity Treatment

The Effect of a Subcutaneous Infusion of GLP-1, OXM, and PYY on Energy Intake and Expenditure in Obese Volunteers

Open access
Tan, Tricia, Behary, Preeshila, Tharakan, George, Minnion, James, Al-Najim, Werd, Albrechtsen, Nicolai J. Wewer, Holst, Jens J., Bloom, Stephen R.·2017·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

Background: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery is currently the most effective treatment of obesity, although limited by availability and operative risk. The gut hormones Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), Peptide YY (PYY), and Oxyntomodulin (OXM) are elevated postprandially after RYGB, which has been postulated to contribute to its metabolic benefits. Objective: We hypothesized that infusion of the three gut hormones to achieve levels similar to those encountered postprandially in RYGB patients might be effective in suppressing appetite. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a continuous infusion of GLP-1, OXM, and PYY (GOP) on energy intake and expenditure in obese volunteers. Methods: Obese volunteers were randomized to receive an infusion of GOP or placebo in a single-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study for 10.5 hours a day. This was delivered subcutaneously using a pump device, allowing volunteers to remain ambulatory. Ad libitum food intake studies were performed during the infusion, and energy expenditure was measured using a ventilated hood calorimeter. Results: Postprandial levels of GLP-1, OXM, and PYY seen post RYGB were successfully matched using 4 pmol/kg/min, 4 pmol/kg/min, and 0.4 pmol/kg/min, respectively. This dose led to a mean reduction of 32% in food intake. No significant effects on resting energy expenditure were observed. Conclusion: This is, to our knowledge, the first time that an acute continuous subcutaneous infusion of GOP, replicating the postprandial levels observed after RYGB, is shown to be safe and effective in reducing food intake. This data suggests that triple hormone therapy might be a useful tool against obesity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2017-00469

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • During 10.5 h of GOP or saline infusion, GOP resulted in a 32% reduction in food intake compared with control.

    “In another study, during 10.5 h of GOP or saline infusion, colonists were asked to eat ad libitum for lunch and dinner, resulting in a 32% reduction in food intake in the GOP group compared to the control group [70].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 88

Authors
Tan, T., Behary, P., Tharakan, G., Minnion, J., Al-Najim, W., Albrechtsen, N. J. W., Holst, J. J., & Bloom, S. R.
Affiliations
  • Hammersmith Hospital (GB)
  • Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolism, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, London W12 0HS, United Kingdom
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Bloom, Stephen R.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2017-04-04
Volume
102
Issue
7
Pages
2364-2372
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2604119137
Cited by
88
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 4
FWCI
7.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust/Institute of Cancer Research
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (FP7-HEALTH-2009-241592, CL-2016-21-002)
  • Imperial College London
  • Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • Medical Research Council (FP7-HEALTH-2009-241592, MR/K02115X/1, MR/J010731/1)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (FP7-HEALTH-2009-241592 EuroCHIP, FP7-HEALTH-2009-241592)
  • FP7 Health (2009-241592 EuroCHIP)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
Keywords
glucagon-like peptide-1, oxyntomodulin, peptide YY, gastrointestinal hormones, obesity, appetite suppression, dietary intake, energy expenditure, subcutaneous infusion, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, postprandial hormone levels
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Energy Metabolism, Female, Follow-Up Studies, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Morbid, Pain Measurement, Volunteers, Gastric Bypass, Body Mass Index, Single-Blind Method, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment, Cross-Over Studies, Area Under Curve, Peptide YY, Glucagon-Like Peptide 1, Oxyntomodulin, Infusions, Subcutaneous, Patient Safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review