The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Cardiovascular Safety During and After Use of Phentermine and Topiramate
Open accessAbstract
Context: Increases in heart rate were seen during the clinical program for fixed-dose combination phentermine (PHEN) and topiramate (TPM), an oral medication indicated for weight management; however, the effect on cardiovascular (CV) outcomes is uncertain. Objective: The aim of the present study was to determine the extent to which the rates of major adverse CV events (MACE) in patients using PHEN and TPM (including fixed dose) differed from the MACE rates during unexposed periods. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: MarketScan, US insurance billing data. Patients or Other Participants: Patients aged >18 years with ≥6 months of continuous enrollment in the database before taking PHEN and/or TPM or after stopping these medications. Interventions: PHEN and TPM, taken separately and together (including fixed dose). Main Outcome Measures: MACE, a composite of hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction and stroke and in-hospital CV death. Results: Because the outcomes are rare and the duration of medication use was brief, few events occurred. The MACE rates among current users of PHEN/TPM, fixed-dose PHEN/TPM, and PHEN were lower than those among unexposed former users. In contrast, the rate of MACE among current users of TPM was greater than among unexposed former users [incidence rate ratio: PHEN/TPM, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.19 to 1.78; fixed-PHEN/TPM, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.03 to 1.70; PHEN, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.91; TPM, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.33 to 1.87). Conclusions: Overall, the data indicated no increased risk of MACE for current PHEN/TPM users; however, the 95% CIs for the PHEN/TPM groups were broad, indicating that the data were compatible with a wide range of possible values.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A retrospective cohort of over 500,000 patients taking PHEN/TPM, 36.9% of whom were older than 50 years, found no increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events for current users.
“although one retrospective cohort analysed data from over 500,000 patients taking PHEN/TPM, 36.9% of which were >50 years (no maximum age), and found no increased risk of MACE for current users [114].”
From Obesity pharmacotherapy in older adults: a narrative review of evidence (2025) · cites this paper as [114]
In a recent study, adverse cardiovascular events among users of phentermine/topiramate ER were less frequent than among unexposed former users.
“In a recent study, the occurrence of adverse cardiovascular events among the users of phentermine/topiramate ER was less frequent than the unexposed former users [40].”
From Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Anti-Obesity Treatment: Where Do We Stand? (2021) · cites this paper as [40]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 15 · Cited by 42
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Rothman, 2008, Modern epidemiology
Metadata
- Authors
- Ritchey, M. E., Harding, A., Hunter, S., Peterson, C., Sager, P. T., Kowey, P. R., Nguyen, L., Thomas, S., Cainzos-Achirica, M., Rothman, K. J., Andrews, E. B., & Anthony, M. S.
- Affiliations
- RTI Health Solutions (US)
- Vivus (United States) (US)
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- Thomas Jefferson University (US)
- RTI Health Solutions, Barcelona, Spain
- Corresponding author
- Ritchey, Mary E
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 2018-09-21
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 513-522
- ISSN
- 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7197
- PMC
- PMC6318778
- OpenAlex
- W2891354593
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5
- FWCI
- 3.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Vivus
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Keywords
- phentermine, topiramate, cardiovascular safety, major adverse cardiovascular events, weight management, fixed-dose combination, myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiovascular mortality, heart rate
- MeSH terms
- Topiramate, Adolescent, Adult, Drug Combinations, Female, Heart Rate, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Obesity, Phentermine, Retrospective Studies, Weight Loss, Incidence, Anti-Obesity Agents, Stroke, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review