Cited by 35Thyroid Disorders and TreatmentsThyroid and Parathyroid SurgeryRegulation of Appetite and Obesity

Effects of altering levothyroxine dose on energy expenditure and body composition in subjects treated with LT4

Open access
Samuels, Mary H, Kolobova, Irina, Niederhausen, Meike, Purnell, Jonathan Q, Schuff, Kathryn G·2018·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

Background: It is unclear whether variations in thyroid status within or near the reference range affect energy expenditure, body mass, or body composition. Methods: 138 subjects treated with levothyroxine (LT4) for hypothyroidism with normal TSH levels underwent measurement of total, resting, and physical activity energy expenditure; thermic effect of food; substrate oxidation; dietary intake; and body composition. They were assigned to receive an unchanged, higher, or lower LT4 dose in randomized, double-blind fashion, targeting one of three TSH ranges (0.34 to 2.50, 2.51 to 5.60, or 5.61 to 12.0 mU/L). The doses were adjusted every 6 weeks to achieve target TSH levels. Baseline measures were reassessed at 6 months. Results: At study end, the mean LT4 doses and TSH levels were 1.50 ± 0.07, 1.32 ± 0.07, and 0.78 ± 0.08 µg/kg (P < 0.001) and 1.85 ± 0.25, 3.93 ± 0.38, and 9.49 ± 0.80 mU/L (P < 0.001), respectively, in the three arms. No substantial metabolic differences in outcome were found among the three arms, although direct correlations were observed between decreases in thyroid status and decreases in resting energy expenditure for all subjects. The subjects could not ascertain how their LT4 dose had been adjusted but the preferred LT4 dose they perceived to be higher (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Altering LT4 doses in subjects with hypothyroidism to vary TSH levels in and near the reference range did not have major effects on energy expenditure or body composition. Subjects treated with LT4 preferred the perceived higher LT4 doses despite a lack of objective effect. Our data do not support adjusting LT4 doses in patients with hypothyroidism to achieve potential improvements in weight or body composition.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2018-01203

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adjusting LT4 dose to manipulate serum TSH levels in and near limits of reference range does not have any significant effects on energy expenditure or body weight and composition.

    “Furthermore, adjusting the LT4 dose to manipulate serum TSH levels in and near the limits of the reference range does not have any significant effects on energy expenditure or body weight and composition (76).”

    From ETA guidelines for the use of levothyroxine sodium preparations in monotherapy to optimize the treatment of hypothyroidism (2025) · cites this paper as [76]

    The Results (body composition and energy expenditure by intention-to-treat analysis; page unavailable) found no differences among the assigned dose arms in energy expenditure or body composition, and the Discussion reports no effect on body weight. But the Results also report statistically significant correlations between thyroid-status changes and resting energy expenditure per lean body mass. Thus, saying there were no significant effects on energy expenditure at all overstates the finding. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 35

Authors
Samuels, M. H., Kolobova, I., Niederhausen, M., Purnell, J. Q., & Schuff, K. G.
Affiliations
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Samuels, Mary H
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2018-08-24
Volume
103
Issue
11
Pages
4163-4175
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2888737960
Cited by
35
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (RO1 DK075496)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1 RR024120)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
Keywords
levothyroxine dose adjustment, hypothyroidism, thyroid-stimulating hormone, energy expenditure, resting energy expenditure, physical activity energy expenditure, thermic effect of food, substrate oxidation, body composition, body mass
MeSH terms
Body Composition, Body Weight, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Energy Metabolism, Female, Humans, Hypothyroidism, Male, Middle Aged, Reference Values, Thyroid Gland, Thyroxine, Treatment Outcome, Hormone Replacement Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review