The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Treatment of prolactin-secreting macroadenomas with the once-weekly dopamine agonist cabergoline
Abstract
Dopamine agonist administration is the primary therapy for macroprolactinomas, but bromocriptine is the only agent approved in the United States. Its use is limited by a high incidence of side effects, a short duration of action, and a lack of effectiveness in some patients. Cabergoline is a long-acting dopamine agonist specific for the D2 receptor that is more effective and better tolerated than bromocriptine in women with microadenomas or idiopathic hyperprolactinemia. However, experience with cabergoline in the treatment of patients with macroadenomas is limited. We report the first study of chronic administration of cabergoline conducted exclusively in patients with macroprolactinomas. Fifteen patients (8 women, 7 men) ages 18-76 yr were studied in an open-label 48-week dose escalation trial of cabergoline administered once per week. Eleven patients had received prior therapy with other dopamine agonists. Mean prolactin (PRL) levels decreased by 93.6%, and normal levels were attained in 73% of patients at doses of 0.5-3.0 mg per week. Three of five patients who had failed to normalize PRL on prior dopamine agonists achieved normal levels. Gonadal function was restored in all hypogonadal men and in 75% of premenopausal women with amenorrhea. Tumor size decreased in 11 of the 15 patients. Side effects were minimal. Of the 5 patients who had experienced side effects in prior dopamine agonists, 4 had none on cabergoline, and the fifth had milder symptoms. During two further years of follow up, the improvement in PRL levels, gonadal function, and tumor size has persisted during cabergoline administration, and three patients have experienced a further decline in PRL and/or tumor size. This study demonstrates the effectiveness and minimal side effects of once-weekly cabergoline for treatment of macroprolactinomas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Frank, M. J., & O'Reilly, R. C. (2006) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/0735-7044.120.3.497 · Cited by 472
Briet, C., Salenave, S., Bonneville, J.-F., Laws, E. R., & Chanson, P. (2015) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2015-1042 · Cited by 409
Prolactinomas Resistant to Standard Dopamine Agonists Respond to Chronic Cabergoline Treatment
Colao, A. (1997) · Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.82.3.876 · Cited by 276
Colao, A., Vitale, G., Cappabianca, P., Briganti, F., Ciccarelli, A., De Rosa, M., Zarrilli, S., & Lombardi, G. (2004) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2003-030979 · Cited by 256
Giant prolactinomas in men: efficacy of cabergoline treatment
Corsello, S. M., Ubertini, G., Altomare, M., Lovicu, R. M., Migneco, M. G., Rota, C. A., & Colosimo, C. (2003) · Clinical Endocrinology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2265.2003.01770.x · Cited by 148
Metadata
- Authors
- Biller, B. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 1996-06-01
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2338-2343
- ISSN
- 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2092902679
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treatment of prolactin-secreting macroadenomas with the once-weekly dopamine agonist cabergoline. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/jc.81.6.2338
- The paper
- Biller, B. M. (1996). Treatment of prolactin-secreting macroadenomas with the once-weekly dopamine agonist cabergoline. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.81.6.2338
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.