The DOI matches its Crossref record.
High Dietary Phytoestrogen Intake Is Associated with Higher Bone Mineral Density in Postmenopausal but Not Premenopausal Women
Open accessAbstract
Animal studies demonstrated that phytoestrogen had a protective effect against bone loss after ovariectomy. However, data on dietary phytoestrogen intake as well as its relationship with bone mineral density (BMD) in human are not available. Six hundred fifty southern Chinese women, aged 19 to 86 yr, were recruited to determine their dietary phytoestrogen intake by a food frequency questionnaire. BMDs at the lumbar spine and hip region were measured using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. The subjects were analyzed according to various tertiles of phytoestrogen intake. Among the postmenopausal women (n = 357), significant differences in the lumbar spine (L2-4) BMD (0.820 +/- 0.145 vs. 0.771 +/- 0.131 g/cm2, P < 0.05) and Ward's triangle BMD (0.450 +/- 0.151 vs. 0.415 +/- 0.142 g/cm2; P < 0.05) were found between the highest and lowest intake of isoflavone after adjusting for age, height, weight, years since menopause, smoking, alcohol consumption, HRT usage, and daily calcium intake. Women with the highest intake of isoflavone had significantly lower levels of serum PTH (19.38 +/- 14.61 vs. 26.56 +/- 11.19 pg/ml; P < 0.05), osteocalcin (4.95 +/- 3.61 vs. 6.69 +/- 5.05 mg/liter; P = 0.05), and urinary N-telopeptide (34.18 +/- 25.31 vs. 49.66 +/- 41.00 nmol bone collagen equivalents/mmol creatinine; P < 0.05) when compared with those with the lowest intake of isoflavone. No association between dietary phytoestrogen intake and BMDs was seen in the premenopausal women with high endogenous E (n = 293). In conclusion, postmenopausal women with habitually high intake of dietary isoflavone are associated with higher BMD values at both the spine and hip region. Customarily high isoflavone intake may help to reverse the state of secondary hyperparathyroidism associated with E withdrawal and hence lower the rate of bone turnover in postmenopausal women.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Setchell, K. D. R., Brown, N. M., & Lydeking-Olsen, E. (2002) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/132.12.3577 · Cited by 1,209
Estimated Asian adult soy protein and isoflavone intakes
Messina, M., Nagata, C., & Wu, A. H. (2006) · Nutrition and Cancer · doi:10.1207/s15327914nc5501_1 · Cited by 435
Mechanick, J. I., Brett, E. M., Chausmer, A. B., Dickey, R. A., Wallach, S., Bergman, D. A., Garber, J. R., Hamilton, C. R., Handelsman, Y., Holdy, K. E., et al. (2003) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.4158/ep.9.5.417 · Cited by 73
Effects of phytoestrogens on bone turnover in postmenopausal women with a history of breast cancer
Nikander, E., Metsä-Heikkilä, M., Ylikorkala, O., & Tiitinen, A. (2004) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2003-031166 · Cited by 56
Nutritional Strategies and Sex Hormone Interactions in Women
Rehrer, N. J., McLay-Cooke, R. T., & Sims, S. T. (2017) · Sex Hormones, Exercise and Women · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-44558-8_6 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Mei, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 2001-11-01
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 5217-5221
- ISSN
- 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2045198522
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.