Lessons from 30 years of clinical diagnosis and treatment of congenital adrenal hyperplasia in five middle european countries
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
One study calculated the standardized mortality ratio (SMR) to be 3 times higher in children with congenital adrenal hyperplasia, and mortality was significantly higher in infancy and children up to 4 years old.
“One study calculated the standardized mortality ratio (SMR) to be 3 times higher in children with CAH, and the mortality was significantly higher in infancy and children up to 4 years old (45), especially in the salt-wasting phenotype (46, 47).”
From Hypoglycaemia in adrenal insufficiency (2023) · cites this paper as [46]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 52
- Authors
- Kovacs, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 2001-07-01
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2958-2964
- ISSN
- 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4251903652
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 0.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
- Keywords
- congenital adrenal hyperplasia, diagnosis, treatment, adrenal insufficiency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
