The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Menstrual Cycle Irregularity and Risk for Future Cardiovascular Disease
Open accessAbstract
Cross-sectional studies suggest that women who have irregular menstrual cycles and hyperandrogenism may be at increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, prospective data are lacking on the relationship between menstrual cycle irregularity and subsequent CVD risk. The objective of this study was to assess prospectively the risk for coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke associated with a history of irregular menstrual cycles. The study design was a prospective cohort study of 82,439 female nurses who provided information in 1982 on prior menstrual regularity (at ages 20-35 yr) and were followed through 1996 for cardiovascular events. Incident reports of nonfatal myocardial infarction, fatal CHD, and nonfatal and fatal stroke were made. Medical records were reviewed for confirmation. During 14 yr (1,155,915 person-yr) of follow-up, there were 1417 incident cases of CHD and 838 incident cases of stroke, including 471 cases of ischemic stroke. Compared with women reporting a history of very regular menstrual cycles, women reporting usually irregular or very irregular cycles had an increased risk for nonfatal or fatal CHD [age-adjusted relative risks (RR), 1.25 and 1.67, respectively; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 1.07-1.47 and 1.35-2.06, respectively]. Increased risks for CHD associated with prior cycle irregularity remained significant after adjustment for body mass index and several potential confounders. There was a nonsignificant increase in overall stroke risk (RR, 1.30; 95% CI = 0.97-1.74) and in ischemic stroke risk (RR, 1.40; 95% CI = 0.97-2.04) associated with very irregular cycles. Menstrual cycle irregularity may be a marker of metabolic abnormalities predisposing to increased risk for CVD.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 528
Metadata
- Authors
- Solomon, C. G., Hu, F. B., Dunaif, A., Rich-Edwards, J. E., Stampfer, M. J., Willett, W. C., Speizer, F. E., & Manson, J. E.
- Affiliations
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Solomon, Caren G.
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 2002-05
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2013-2017
- ISSN
- 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7197
- OpenAlex
- W2078800104
- Cited by
- 528
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 16.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- nrs.harvard.edu
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (CA-40356)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK 36798, R01DK040605, DK-40605, R01DK036798)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Keywords
- menstrual irregularity, cardiovascular risk, coronary artery disease, stroke, ischemic stroke, hyperandrogenism, women's health, metabolic abnormalities
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Cardiovascular Diseases, Female, Humans, Menstrual Cycle, Middle Aged, Periodicity, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Incidence, Myocardial Ischemia, Stroke
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review