The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Surgical Treatment of Prolactin-Secreting Pituitary Adenomas: Early Results and Long-Term Outcome
Open accessAbstract
Medical therapy with dopaminergic drugs is the preferred initial treatment for symptomatic prolactin (PRL)-secreting adenomas; but in recent years, there has been a renewed interest in surgery. The aim of this study is to report a large series of patients operated for prolactinoma in the last 10 yr. A total of 120 consecutive patients (93 female, 27 male) underwent surgery from January 1990 to December 1999. Their mean age at surgery was 29.7 +/- 0.9 yr. Fifty-nine patients (49.2%) had a microadenoma, and the remaining 61 (50.8%) had a macroadenoma, of which 24 (20%) were intrasellar and 37 (30.8%) were extrasellar adenoma. Magnetic resonance imaging signs of invasion of the cavernous sinus were detected in 18 patients (15.0%). Thirty-one patients (25.8%) had never been treated before, whereas the remaining 89 (74.2%) had received dopaminergic drugs. After surgery, normalization of PRL levels occurred in 77 patients (64.2%). Logistic regression analysis showed that the only predictive factor of unsuccessful surgery was a high preoperative PRL level. Recurrence of hyperprolactinemia occurred in 13 of the 77 cured patients (16.9%) during a mean follow-up of 50.2 +/- 3.0 months; the 5-yr disease-free survival was 75.9%. Extrasellar extension of the tumor and presence of a postoperative PRL response to TRH were associated with a lower risk of relapse. In summary, surgery normalized PRL levels and relieved symptoms of hyperprolactinemia in most patients. Recurrence of hyperprolactinemia occurred within 4 yr after surgery. Transsphenoidal surgery can be offered as a definitive therapy, especially to patients with intrasellar tumors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Diagnosis and treatment of hyperprolactinemia: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline
Melmed, S., Casanueva, F. F., Hoffman, A. R., Kleinberg, D. L., Montori, V. M., Schlechte, J. A., & Wass, J. A. H. (2011) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2010-1692 · Cited by 1,844
Guidelines of the Pituitary Society for the diagnosis and management of prolactinomas
Casanueva, F. F., Molitch, M. E., Schlechte, J. A., Abs, R., Bonert, V., Bronstein, M. D., Brue, T., Cappabianca, P., Colao, A., Fahlbusch, R., et al. (2006) · Clinical Endocrinology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2265.2006.02562.x · Cited by 829
Petersenn, S., Fleseriu, M., Casanueva, F. F., Giustina, A., Biermasz, N., Biller, B. M. K., Bronstein, M., Chanson, P., Fukuoka, H., Gadelha, M., et al. (2023) · Nature Reviews Endocrinology · doi:10.1038/s41574-023-00886-5 · Cited by 411
The Endoscopic versus the Traditional Approach in Pituitary Surgery
Frank, G., Pasquini, E., Farneti, G., Mazzatenta, D., Sciarretta, V., Grasso, V., & Faustini Fustini, M. (2006) · Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1159/000095534 · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Authors
- Losa, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 2002-07-01
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 3180-3186
- ISSN
- 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1983616653
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Surgical Treatment of Prolactin-Secreting Pituitary Adenomas: Early Results and Long-Term Outcome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/jc.87.7.3180
- The paper
- Losa, M. (2002). Surgical Treatment of Prolactin-Secreting Pituitary Adenomas: Early Results and Long-Term Outcome. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.87.7.3180
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.