Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,968

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Coated Charcoal Immunoassay of Insulin

HERBERT, VICTOR, LAU, KAM-SENG, GOTTLIEB, CHESTER W., BLEICHER, SHELDON J.·1965·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

Charcoal premixed with dextran of average molecular weight 80,000 almost instantly adsorbs free insulin but rejects antibody-bound insulin. The use of such dextran-coated charcoal makes simpler and more rapid the immunoassay of insulin in biologic fluids, using radioisotope dilution with 131I-insulin and “biopsy” of the insulin pool by antibody to insulin. The procedure here described yields a straight line graph when insulin added is plotted against insulin recovered.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jcem-25-10-1375

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 2,968

Metadata

Authors
HERBERT, V., LAU, K.-S., GOTTLIEB, C. W., & BLEICHER, S. J.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
1965-10
Volume
25
Issue
10
Pages
1375-1384
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2078073869
Cited by
2,968
References
0
FWCI
72.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coated Charcoal Immunoassay of Insulin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/jcem-25-10-1375
The paper
HERBERT, V., LAU, K.-S., GOTTLIEB, C. W., & BLEICHER, S. J. (1965). Coated Charcoal Immunoassay of Insulin. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem-25-10-1375

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.