The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Comparison of Pentagastrin Injection and Calcium Infusion as Provocative Agents for the Detection of Medullary Carcinoma of the Thyroid1
Abstract
The relative effectiveness of pentagastrin injection and calcium infusion as clinical stimulatory tests for the detection of medullary thyroid carcinoma (MCT) were compared. A specific radioimmunoassay for human thyrocalcitonin (TCT) was used to measure secretory responses. Tests were conducted with 38 patients having either surgically proven MCT or a positive family history of the disease. Base line plasma TCT levels were clearly elevated (1.4 to 455 ng/ml) in 7 patients and were undetectable (less than 0.24 ng/ml) in 31. Each patient was tested by giving, on separate days, a rapid intravenous injection of pentagastrin (0.5 μg/kg) and an intravenous infusion of calcium gluconate (15 mg Ca/kg/4 hr). All 7 patients with elevated base line levels of plasma TCT showed positive responses to both pentagastrin and calcium. In three patients the mean peak response to calcium occurred 30 min after the beginning of the infusion with mean plasma TCT rising approximately 5-fold above base line. The peak response to pentagastrin occurred 2 min after the injection and averaged 10- to 11-fold above base line. While TCT levels remained elevated throughout the calcium infusion, the responses to pentagastrin injection were of shorter duration, returning to base line by 30 to 60 min. Three patients in the group of 31 without elevated base line levels of TCT, showed clear cut elevations in TCT after pentagastrin injection but not during calcium infusion. All 3 subsequently were shown by surgery to have small foci of medullary carcinoma. The results suggest that pentagastrin injection can elicit a more rapid and intense TCT secretory response than a standard calcium infusion test in patients with MCT. Our experience to date further suggests that a pentagastrin injection may constitute a rapid and convenient provocative test for increased secretion of TCT and be especially valuable for the diagnosis of MCT in its early subclinical stages.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The diagnosis and medical management of advanced neuroendocrine tumors.
Kaltsas, G. A., Besser, G. M., & Grossman, A. B. (2004) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2003-0014 · Cited by 674
Becker, K. L., Nylén, E. S., White, J. C., Müller, B., & Snider, R. H. (2004) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2002-021444 · Cited by 578
Lips, C., Landsvater, R. M., Hoppener, J., Geerdink, R. A., Blijham, G., van Veen, J. M. J.-S., van Gils, A., de Wit, M. J., Zewald, R. A., Berends, M., et al. (1994) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199409293311302 · Cited by 454
Calcitonin: Physiology and Pathophysiology
Austin, L. A., & Heath, H. (1981) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198101293040505 · Cited by 420
Kouvaraki, M. A., Shapiro, S. E., Perrier, N. D., Cote, G. J., Gagel, R. F., Hoff, A. O., Sherman, S. I., Lee, J. E., & Evans, D. B. (2005) · Thyroid · doi:10.1089/thy.2005.15.531 · Cited by 288
Metadata
- Authors
- HENNESSY, J. F., WELLS, S. A., ONTJES, D. A., & COOPER, C. W.
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 1974-09
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 487-495
- ISSN
- 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7197
- OpenAlex
- W2047400327
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Comparison of Pentagastrin Injection and Calcium Infusion as Provocative Agents for the Detection of Medullary Carcinoma of the Thyroid1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/jcem-39-3-487
- The paper
- HENNESSY, J. F., WELLS, S. A., ONTJES, D. A., & COOPER, C. W. (1974). A Comparison of Pentagastrin Injection and Calcium Infusion as Provocative Agents for the Detection of Medullary Carcinoma of the Thyroid1. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem-39-3-487
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.