The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hormonal Dynamics at Midcycle: A Reevaluation*
Abstract
The dynamics of ovarian and pituitary hormone changes during the midcycle period were evaluated. Changes in hormone levels were determined at 2-h intervals for 5 consecutive days during the periovulatory phase of the cycle in five women. During the 50 h preceding the onset of the surge, the rates of increments for estradiol (E2), progesterone (P4), and LH were similar, with doubling times of 57-61 h. The onset of LH and FSH surges was found to occur abruptly (LH doubled within 2 h). They were temporally associated with the attainment of peak E2 levels and occurred 12 h after the initiation of a rapid rise of P4. The mean duration of the surge was 48 h, with a rapidly ascending limb (doubling time, 5.2 h) lasting 14 h accompanied by a rapid decline of E2 and a continued rise of P4. The surge was followed by a peak plateau of gonadotropin levels lasting for 14 h and a transient leveling of P4. The longer descending limb (half-time, 9.6 h), lasting for 20 h, was associated with a second rapid rise of P4, beginning 36 h after surge onset or 12 h before termination of the surge. By using the onset of the LH surge as a reference point, our data provide a relatively precise picture of the hormonal changes preceding the onset of the gonadotropin surge and the temporal relationship between the multiphasic P4 rise and pituitary-ovarian function.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McNATTY, K. P., SMITH, D. M., MAKRIS, A., OSATHANONDH, R., & RYAN, K. J. (1979) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem-49-6-851 · Cited by 522
McNATTY, K. P., MAKRIS, A., DEGRAZIA, C., RAPIN, O., & RYAN, K. J. (1979) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem-49-5-687 · Cited by 367
Cited by
Genetic conflicts in human pregnancy
Haig, D. (1993) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/418300 · Cited by 1,253
“In the "LH spike" that accompanies ovulation, hLH reaches 100 mIU/ml (Hoff et al., 1983). lUs of hCG and hLH are not directly comparable.”
BackgroundThe normal menstrual cycle in women
Mihm, M., Gangooly, S., & Muttukrishna, S. (2011) · Animal Reproduction Science · doi:10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.08.030 · Cited by 448
Frozen embryo transfer: a review on the optimal endometrial preparation and timing
Mackens, S., Santos-Ribeiro, S., van de Vijver, A., Racca, A., Van Landuyt, L., Tournaye, H., & Blockeel, C. (2017) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dex285 · Cited by 361
Lipson, S. F., & Ellison, P. T. (1996) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019055 · Cited by 299
SANTORO, N., WIERMAN, M. E., FILICORI, M., WALDSTREICHER, J., & CROWLEY, W. F. (1986) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem-62-1-109 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- HOFF, J. D., QUIGLEY, M. E., & YEN, S. S. C.
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 1983-10
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 792-796
- ISSN
- 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7197
- OpenAlex
- W1995145782
- Cited by
- 525
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hormonal Dynamics at Midcycle: A Reevaluation*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/jcem-57-4-792
- The paper
- HOFF, J. D., QUIGLEY, M. E., & YEN, S. S. C. (1983). Hormonal Dynamics at Midcycle: A Reevaluation*. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem-57-4-792
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.