The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Natural History of Untreated Hyperprolactinemia: A Prospective Analysis*
Abstract
This report describes the results of a long term prospective study of 30 women with hyperprolactinemia who were not treated and who underwent yearly clinical, hormonal, and radiographic evaluation for an average of 5.2 yr (range 3-7 yr). At entry into the study 18 women had amenorrhea, 8 had oligomenorrhea, and 4 had regular menstrual periods. The initial mean serum PRL levels did not differ in women grouped according to menstrual function. Nine women (35%) had improvement in clinical symptoms. Serum PRL decreased, and menstrual periods normalized more often in those who initially had oligomenorrhea or regular menstrual periods. In most amenorrheic women serum PRL levels did not decline, and menstrual symptoms did not improve. Six of 30 women had an increase in serum PRL, 14 had no change, and 10 had a decrease, in 6 of whom serum PRL was normal at the last observation. Twenty-seven women had serial radiographic studies. Four (15%) of the 13 women with initially abnormal radiographic findings had normal studies later, 2 had tumor progression, and 7 no change. Four of 14 women who had normal radiographic studies initially developed radiographic evidence of a pituitary tumor, although the radiographic changes were minimal, and no patient developed a macroadenoma or pituitary hypofunction. Increases or decreases in serum PRL did not accurately predict changes in tumor size. Prior estrogen use and previous pregnancies did not increase the likelihood of tumor appearance or enhance tumor growth. The clinical presentation of the patient was an important factor in predicting which patients had a decline in serum PRL and resolution of symptoms. We conclude that patients with hyperprolactinemia are unlikely to have progression of their disease and may, in fact, have clinical and radiographic improvement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Diagnosis and treatment of hyperprolactinemia: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline
Melmed, S., Casanueva, F. F., Hoffman, A. R., Kleinberg, D. L., Montori, V. M., Schlechte, J. A., & Wass, J. A. H. (2011) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2010-1692 · Cited by 1,844
Self-citationFrancis, G. L., Waguespack, S. G., Bauer, A. J., Angelos, P., Benvenga, S., Cerutti, J. M., Dinauer, C. A., Hamilton, J., Hay, I. D., Luster, M., et al. (2015) · Thyroid · doi:10.1089/thy.2014.0460 · Cited by 1,238
Guidelines of the Pituitary Society for the diagnosis and management of prolactinomas
Casanueva, F. F., Molitch, M. E., Schlechte, J. A., Abs, R., Bonert, V., Bronstein, M. D., Brue, T., Cappabianca, P., Colao, A., Fahlbusch, R., et al. (2006) · Clinical Endocrinology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2265.2006.02562.x · Cited by 829
Self-citationPetersenn, S., Fleseriu, M., Casanueva, F. F., Giustina, A., Biermasz, N., Biller, B. M. K., Bronstein, M., Chanson, P., Fukuoka, H., Gadelha, M., et al. (2023) · Nature Reviews Endocrinology · doi:10.1038/s41574-023-00886-5 · Cited by 411
Chidiac, R. M., & Aron, D. C. (1997) · Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/s0889-8529(05)70242-5 · Cited by 140
Metadata
- Authors
- SCHLECHTE, J., DOLAN, K., SHERMAN, B., CHAPLER, F., & LUCIANO, A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 1989-02
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 412-418
- ISSN
- 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7197
- OpenAlex
- W2165368949
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Natural History of Untreated Hyperprolactinemia: A Prospective Analysis*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/jcem-68-2-412
- The paper
- SCHLECHTE, J., DOLAN, K., SHERMAN, B., CHAPLER, F., & LUCIANO, A. (1989). The Natural History of Untreated Hyperprolactinemia: A Prospective Analysis*. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem-68-2-412
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.