Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 334

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Histomorphometry of Bone in Primary Hyperparathyroidism: Preservation of Cancellous Bone Structure*

PARISIEN, MAY, SILVERBERG, SHONNI J., SHANE, ELIZABETH, CRUZ, LUZ DE LA, LINDSAY, ROBERT, BILEZIKIAN, JOHN P., DEMPSTER, DAVID W.·1990·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

To evaluate the effects of primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) on bone mass and structure, we have studied the iliac crest biopsies of 27 patients, 10 males (28-68 yr old) and 17 females (26-72 yr old) with mild PHPT after in vivo tetracycline labeling. All patients had mild hypercalcemia in the absence of any other cause and elevated levels of PTH without radiological evidence of bone disease. Static parameters of bone turnover (osteoid surface, osteoid volume, and eroded surface) were elevated in both men and women compared to normal values; the midmolecule RIA for PTH (PTHMM) was positively correlated with osteoid surface (r = 0.44; P less than 0.025) and eroded surface (r = 0.58; P less than 0.005). Dynamic parameters of bone turnover (mineralizing surface, expressed as double plus half single labeled surface, and bone formation rate at tissue level) were elevated compared to normal values; PTHMM was positively correlated with double plus half single labeled surfaces (r = 0.33; P less than 0.05) and with bone formation rate at the tissue level (r = 0.37; P less than 0.05). The mineral apposition rate was within the limits of normal values and positively correlated with PTHMM (r = 0.34; P less than 0.05). Histomorphometric parameters of bone structure [cancellous bone volume (BV/TV), trabecular thickness (Tb. Th), trabecular number (Tb.N), trabecular separation (Tb.Sp), cortical thickness (Ct.Th), and total bone density (TBD)] were compared to those in 20 autopsy control subjects, 12 men (33-60 yr old) and 8 women (27-75 yr old). BV/TV and Tb.N were significantly higher in PHPT patients than controls (P less than 0.02 and P less than 0.001, respectively). Tb.Sp was significantly lower in PHPT patients than controls (P less than 0.001), whereas Tb.Th was not significantly different between PHPT patients and controls. Ct.Th was significantly lower in PHPT patients than in controls (P less than 0.001), whereas TBD was not significantly different between the two groups. BV/TV was negatively correlated with age in both controls and PHPT patients. Tb.N showed a negative correlation and Tb.Sp a positive correlation with age in controls (r = -0.47; P less than 0.05 and r = 0.52; P less than 0.02, respectively), but they were not significantly dependent on age in PHPT patients. Tb.Th, while showing no significant age-related change in controls, was negatively correlated with age in PHPT patients (r = -0.42; P less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jcem-70-4-930

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
PARISIEN, M., SILVERBERG, S. J., SHANE, E., CRUZ, L. D. L., LINDSAY, R., BILEZIKIAN, J. P., & DEMPSTER, D. W.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
1990-04
Volume
70
Issue
4
Pages
930-938
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2116921062
Cited by
334
References
0
FWCI
17.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.