Cited by 197Thyroid Disorders and TreatmentsClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

The Use and Misuse of the Sensitive Thyrotropin Assays

NICOLOFF, JOHN T., SPENCER, CAROLE A.·1990·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

Since its introduction five years ago, the sensitive TSH (S-TSH) immunometric assay (IMA) has established itself as an important new thyroid test. In fact, TSH IMAs have now replaced the less sensitive first generation TSH radioimmunoassay (RIA) methods. As implied by the term sensitive, these TSH IMAs provide both improved analytic assay precision as well as clinical sensitivity for routinely distinguishing the suppressed serum TSH values characteristic of hyperthyroidism from euthyroidism (1). This improved sensitivity largely results from the IMA sandwich assay configuration in which two anti-TSH antibodies are employed, rather than the single antibody RIA methods (competitive ligand binding assays). Usually one or both of these antibodies are monoclonal and, therefore, possess a high degree of specificity for the TSH epitopes. The first antibody, which is present in excess and bound to a solid support such as a tube wall or bead, is directed at the specific β-subunit of TSH.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jcem-71-3-553

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Models initially assumed an inverse linear correlation between TSH and T4, later changed to a log-linear relationship, which has remained the standard model.

    “Models initially assumed an inverse linear correlation between TSH and T4 (14–17), but following more detailed analysis this was later changed to a log-linear relationship, which has remained the standard model ever since (18–22).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 6 · Cited by 197

Authors
NICOLOFF, J. T., & SPENCER, C. A.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
1990-09
Volume
71
Issue
3
Pages
553-558
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2076291156
Cited by
197
References
6
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
10.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01dk011727-24)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK11727)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01 RR-43)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
thyroid-stimulating hormone, sandwich immunoassay, TSH radioimmunoassay, hyperthyroidism, TSH suppression, monoclonal antibodies, TSH beta subunit, thyroid function tests, assay sensitivity
MeSH terms
Humans, Immunoassay, Radioimmunoassay, Thyrotropin, Fluoroimmunoassay, Immunoradiometric Assay

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review