Thyrotropin (TSH)-releasing hormone stimulation test responses employing third and fourth generation TSH assays.
Abstract
TRH stimulation tests (n = 1109) were performed on 1061 ambulatory and 43 hospitalized patients with varying thyroid status, using a TSH immunochemiluminometric assay with third and fourth generation sensitivity characteristics (functional sensitivity, 0.01 and 0.001 mU/L, respectively). TRH test results were analyzed as both absolute (stimulated minus basal TSH) and fold (stimulated/basal TSH) responses. The absolute TRH response varied 8-fold across the physiological TSH range, whereas the mean fold response remained almost constant (mean +/- SEM, 8.5 +/- 0.2). The fold response became progressively attenuated as basal TSH values declined below physiological levels, becoming essentially absent in clinically thyrotoxic patients with markedly depressed basal serum TSH levels (0.007 +/- 0.002 mU/L). Progressive attenuation also occurred at hypothyroid TSH levels; a markedly impaired fold response (2.5 +/- 0.4) was characteristic of primary hypothyroid patients with basal TSH values greater than 50 mU/L. In untreated central hypothyroid patients with near-normal basal TSH levels, the TRH fold response was impaired (1.7 +/- 0.2), whereas in T4-replaced central hypothyroid patients, fold responses were near normal (5.6 +/- 1.2). Neither nonthyroidal illness, age, or sex appeared to influence the pattern of fold TRH response in the populations evaluated. When using third and fourth generation TSH methodology, the TRH-stimulated TSH fold response is more diagnostically useful than the absolute TRH response. However, if patients have an intact hypothalamic-pituitary axis, there appears to be no diagnostic advantage gained by TRH testing over an accurately measured basal TSH value.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 15 · Cited by 126
- Authors
- Spencer, C. A., Schwarzbein, D., Guttler, R. B., LoPresti, J. S., & Nicoloff, J. T.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern California (US)
- ORCID
- Spencer, C A
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 1993-02
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 494-498
- ISSN
- 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7197
- OpenAlex
- W2069750050
- Cited by
- 126
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 5.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01dk011727-24)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK11727)
- National Center for Research Resources (M01 RR-43)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
- Keywords
- TRH stimulation test, primary hypothyroidism, central hypothyroidism, thyrotoxicosis, hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis, low T3 syndrome
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Graves Disease, Humans, Hypothyroidism, Immunoassay, Luminescent Measurements, Male, Middle Aged, Reference Values, Thyroid Diseases, Thyroid Function Tests, Thyrotropin, Thyrotropin-Releasing Hormone, Thyroxine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review