Effects on bone mass of long term treatment with thyroid hormones: a meta-analysis
Abstract
Osteoporosis is the main cause of spine and hip fractures. Morbidity, mortality, and costs arising from hip fractures have been well documented. Thyroid hormones (TH) are widely prescribed, mainly in the elderly. Some studies (but not all) found a deleterious effect of suppressive TH therapy on bone mass. These conflicting data raised a controversy as to the safety of current prescribing and follow-up habits, which, in turn, raised major health-care issues. To look for a detrimental effect on bone of TH therapy, we performed a meta-analysis (by pooling standardized differences, using a fixed effect model) of all published controlled cross-sectional studies (41, including about 1250 patients) concerning the impact of TH therapy on bone mineral density (BMD). Studies with women receiving estrogen therapy were excluded a priori, as were studies with a high percentage of patients with postoperative hypoparathyroidism, when no separate data were available. We decided to stratify the data according to anatomical site, menopausal status, and suppressive or replacement TH therapy, resulting in 25 meta-analysis on 138 homogeneous subsets of data. The main sources of heterogensity between studies that we could identify were replacement or suppressive TH therapy, menopausal status, site (lumbar spine, femoral neck, Ward's triangle, greater trochanter, midshaft and distal radius, with various percentages of cortical bone), and history of hyperthyroidism, which has recently been found to impair bone mass in a large epidemiological survey. To improve homogeneity, we excluded a posteriori 102 patients from 3 studies, who had a past history of hyperthyroidism and separate BMD data, thus allowing assessment of the TH effect in almost all 25 subset meta-analyses. However, controls were usually not matched with cases for many factors influencing bone mass, such as body weight, age at menarche and at menopause, calcium dietary intake, smoking habits, alcohol intake, exercise, etc. For lumbar spine and hip (as for all other sites), suppressive TH therapy was associated with significant bone loss in postmenopausal women (but not in premenopausal women), whereas, conversely, replacement therapy was associated with bone loss in premenopausal women (spine and hip), but not in postmenopausal women. The detrimental effect of TH appeared more marked on cortical bone than on trabecular bone. Only a large long term prospective placebo-controlled trial of TH therapy (e.g. in benign nodules) evaluating BMD (and ideally fracture rate) would provide further insight into these issues.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The results of this meta-analysis reinforce previous reports that levothyroxine treatment-induced subclinical hyperthyroidism affects bone mineral density reduction in postmenopausal women.
“The results of our meta-analysis reinforce the previous reports that levothyroxine treatment-induced subclinical hyperthyroidism affects BMD reduction in postmenopausal women (16,17,34) for various causes other than DTC were mixed, and the degree of TSH suppression varied considerably.”
From Effect of TSH Suppression Therapy on Bone Mineral Density in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [16]
Apart from higher mortality in patients with suppressed TSH, the most important risks of overtreatment affect the heart, bones, brain, and muscle function.
“Apart from the higher mortality in patients with suppressed TSH the most important risks of overtreatment are those affecting the heart (50), the bones (91), the brain (92) and muscle function (93).”
From Levothyroxine therapy in elderly patients with hypothyroidism (2021) · cites this paper as [91]
TSH-suppressive therapy is associated with significant bone loss at both the lumbar spine and hip in postmenopausal, but not premenopausal, women.
“TSH-suppressive therapy was associated with a significant bone loss at both the lumbar spine and hip in postmenopausal, but not in premenopausal, women (91).”
From Levothyroxine therapy in elderly patients with hypothyroidism (2021) · cites this paper as [91]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 62 · Cited by 398
- Authors
- Uzzan, B., Campos, J., Cucherat, M., Nony, P., Boissel, J. P., & Perret, G. Y.
- Affiliations
- Hôpital Avicenne (FR)
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 1996-12
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 4278-4289
- ISSN
- 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7197
- OpenAlex
- W2162952990
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 12.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
- Keywords
- thyroid hormones, bone mineral density, bone loss, osteoporosis, thyroid hormone replacement, postmenopausal women, premenopausal women, hyperthyroidism, cortical bone, trabecular bone, hip fracture, lumbar spine, hip bone, thyroid nodules, drug safety, estrogen therapy, hypoparathyroidism
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Thyroid Hormones, Bone Density
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review