The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bone turnover markers and bone density across the menopausal transition.
Abstract
We measured lunbar spine and femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD); urine markers of bone resorption; serum markers of bone formation; and serum gonadotrophin, estradiol and inhibin concentrations in a population-based cohort of 281 women aged 45-57 yr. Women were classified into pre-, peri-, and postmenopausal groups, depending on menstrual bleeding patterns. Compared with premenopausal women, BMD was lower only in postmenopausal women but not in women currently using hormone replacement therapy (HRT). BMD decreased with age in the perimenopausal group. Compared with premenopausal women, perimenopausal women had 20% greater urine N-telopeptide excretion (P < 0.05) and a doubling of gonadotrophin levels (P < 0.01), whereas serum estradiol and bone formation marker concentrations were no different. Postmenopausal Women had greater levels of bone turnover markers (P < 0.0001), except free deoxypyridinoline and type I procollagen propeptide. Among postmenopausal women, bone resorption markers were lower in those using HRT. Levels of nearly all bone turnover markers were positively related to serum FSH concentrations (P < 0.0001). Overall, the major independent predictors of BMD were age, urine N-telopeptide, serum bone alkaline phosphatase, and serum, FSH, whereas urine free deoxypyridinoline was positively related to BMD in pre- and perimenopausal women. In conclusion, the perimenopause is associated with elevated bone resorption rates and declining BMD, and factors in addition to estrogen deficiency may also contribute to the pathogenesis of postmenopausal osteoporosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The effects of menopause on longitudinal bone loss from the spine
Pouilles, J. M., Tremollieres, F., & Ribot, C. (1993) · Calcified Tissue International · doi:10.1007/bf00310195 · Cited by 149
Cited by
Pathogenesis of osteoporosis: concepts, conflicts, and prospects
Raisz, L. G. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci27071 · Cited by 1,779
Mazziotti, G., Frara, S., & Giustina, A. (2018) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2018-00005 · Cited by 181
IGF-1 as an early marker for low bone mass or osteoporosis in premenopausal and postmenopausal women
Liu, J.-M., Zhao, H.-Y., Ning, G., Chen, Y., Zhang, L.-Z., Sun, L.-H., Zhao, Y.-J., Xu, M.-Y., & Chen, J.-L. (2008) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism · doi:10.1007/s00774-007-0799-z · Cited by 81
Estrogen Deficiency, Postmenopausal Osteoporosis, and Age-Related Bone Loss
Khosla, S., & Pacifici, R. (2013) · Osteoporosis · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-415853-5.00046-7 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Ebeling, P. R., Atley, L. M., Guthrie, J. R., Burger, H. G., Dennerstein, L., Hopper, J. L., & Wark, J. D.
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 1996-09
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3366-3371
- ISSN
- 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7197
- OpenAlex
- W2122107555
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.