The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Characterization of two cis-acting DNA elements involved in the androgen regulation of the probasin gene
Open accessAbstract
The location and sequence of androgen responsive elements (AREs) in the 5'-flanking DNA of the androgen-regulated rat probasin (PB) gene were determined. The DNA- and steroid-binding domains of the rat androgen receptor [glutathione-S-transferase (GST)-AR1] and the DNA-binding domain and hinge region alone (GST-AR2) were expressed in Escherichia coli as isopropyl-B-D-thioglactopyranoside-induced fusion proteins with GST and purified using glutathione affinity chromatography. Band shift assays indicated that the AR1 peptide was at least five times more effective than AR2 in binding to PB 5'-flanking DNA (-426 to +28), although both gave qualitatively similar patterns and were displaced by anti-AR antibodies. DNase I footprinting experiments revealed two putative AREs: one between positions -236 and -223 (ARE-1) and the other between -140 and -117 (ARE-2). Hormonal regulation of PB was determined by cotransfecting reporter constructions containing the PB 5'-flanking region (-426 to +28) linked to the bacterial chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (CAT) gene with androgen, glucocorticoid, or progesterone receptor expression vectors into human prostatic carcinoma cells (PC-3). PB-CAT gene expression was more effectively induced by androgens than by glucocorticoids or progestins. Both 5'- and 3'-deletion mapping of the PB 5'-flanking DNA revealed that ARE-1 and ARE-2 were required for androgen regulation. A single base mutation in either ARE resulted in a more than 95% loss of androgen induction of CAT. In comparable transfection experiments, the PB hormone-responsive elements showed a greater induction by androgens than did mouse mammary tumor virus or tyrosine aminotransferase elements. Thus, the preferential androgen regulation of the PB gene involves the participation of two different cis-acting DNA elements that bind AR.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Androgen Receptor Defects: Historical, Clinical, and Molecular Perspectives*
QUIGLEY, C. A., BELLIS, A. D., MARSCHKE, K. B., EL-AWADY, M. K., WILSON, E. M., & FRENCH, F. S. (1995) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/edrv-16-3-271 · Cited by 1,447
Activation of the human androgen receptor through a protein kinase A signaling pathway.
Nazareth, L. V., & Weigel, N. L. (1996) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.271.33.19900 · Cited by 429
Roy, A. K., Lavrovsky, Y., Song, C. S., Chen, S., Jung, M. H., Velu, N. K., Bi, B. Y., & Chatterjee, B. (1998) · Vitamins & Hormones · doi:10.1016/s0083-6729(08)60938-3 · Cited by 411
Cleutjens, K. B. J. M., van Eekelen, C. C. E. M., van der Korput, H. A. G. M., Brinkmann, A. O., & Trapman, J. (1996) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.271.11.6379 · Cited by 406
Structural basis of androgen receptor binding to selective androgen response elements
Shaffer, P. L., Jivan, A., Dollins, D. E., Claessens, F., & Gewirth, D. T. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0401123101 · Cited by 400
Metadata
- Authors
- Rennie, P. S.
- Venue
- Molecular Endocrinology
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 1993-01-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 23-36
- ISSN
- 0888-8809 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2063835289
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of two cis-acting DNA elements involved in the androgen regulation of the probasin gene. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/me.7.1.23
- The paper
- Rennie, P. S. (1993). Characterization of two cis-acting DNA elements involved in the androgen regulation of the probasin gene. Molecular Endocrinology. https://doi.org/10.1210/me.7.1.23
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.