The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Specificity of ligand-dependent androgen receptor stabilization: receptor domain interactions influence ligand dissociation and receptor stability
Open accessAbstract
The molecular basis for the different physiological effects of testosterone (T) and dihydrotestosterone (DHT) was investigated using recombinantly expressed wild-type and mutant androgen receptor (AR). Rates of androgen dissociation from nuclear and cytoplasmic AR were compared with hormone- and concentration-dependent receptor degradation rates. T dissociates from AR 3 times faster than DHT or methyltrienolone (R1881) and is less effective in stabilizing the receptor. Analysis of AR deletion mutants and AR/glucocorticoid receptor chimeras indicates that the AR NH2-terminal domain has a specific role in stabilizing the receptor by slowing the rate of ligand dissociation and AR degradation. Amino acid mutations that abolish receptor dimerization, nuclear localization, or DNA-binding activity have no significant effect on androgen dissociation or AR degradation. A naturally occurring steroid-binding domain mutation (Val889 to Met) that causes androgen insensitivity, but does not alter equilibrium androgen binding affinity, lowered the androgen-binding capacity as a result of increased rates of androgen dissociation and AR degradation. Thus, AR stabilization and function require prolonged receptor occupancy with androgen, with a similar extent of stabilization observed at higher concentrations of faster dissociating androgens and lower concentrations of slower dissociating androgens. Retention of receptor-bound androgen is enhanced by an interaction between the AR NH2-terminal and steroid-binding domains. The ligand specificity and concentration dependence of receptor stabilization provide an explanation for physiological differences in the actions of T and DHT.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Androgen Receptor (AR) Coregulators: An Overview
Heinlein, C. A., & Chang, C. (2002) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/edrv.23.2.0460 · Cited by 943
Andersen, R. J., Mawji, N. R., Wang, J., Wang, G., Haile, S., Myung, J.-K., Watt, K., Tam, T., Yang, Y. C., Bañuelos, C. A., et al. (2010) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2010.04.027 · Cited by 503
Role of Hormones in Pilosebaceous Unit Development
Deplewski, D., & Rosenfield, R. L. (2000) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/edrv.21.4.0404 · Cited by 443
Roy, A. K., Lavrovsky, Y., Song, C. S., Chen, S., Jung, M. H., Velu, N. K., Bi, B. Y., & Chatterjee, B. (1998) · Vitamins & Hormones · doi:10.1016/s0083-6729(08)60938-3 · Cited by 411
Zhang, A., Zhao, J. C., Kim, J., Fong, K.-W., Yang, Y. A., Chakravarti, D., Mo, Y.-Y., & Yu, J. (2015) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2015.08.069 · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhou, Z. X.
- Venue
- Molecular Endocrinology
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 1995-02-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 208-218
- ISSN
- 0888-8809 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2037407251
- Cited by
- 411
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Specificity of ligand-dependent androgen receptor stabilization: receptor domain interactions influence ligand dissociation and receptor stability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/me.9.2.208
- The paper
- Zhou, Z. X. (1995). Specificity of ligand-dependent androgen receptor stabilization: receptor domain interactions influence ligand dissociation and receptor stability. Molecular Endocrinology. https://doi.org/10.1210/me.9.2.208
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.