Cited by 183Diabetes and associated disordersGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyT-cell and B-cell Immunology

Genetics of type 1A diabetes

Open access
Redondo, M. J.·2001·Recent Progress in Hormone Research

Abstract

Type 1A diabetes is an autoimmune disease with genetic and environmental factors contributing to its etiology. Twin studies, family studies, and animal models have helped to elucidate the genetics of autoimmune diabetes. Most of the genetic susceptibility is accounted for by human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alleles. The most-common susceptibility haplotypes are DQA1*0301-DQB1*0302 and DQA1*0501-DQB1*0201. Less-common haplotypes such as DQA1*0401-DQB1*0402 and DQA1*0101-DQB1*0501 are associated with high risk for diabetes; however, large study populations are needed to analyze their effect. The DQA1*0102-DQB1*0602 haplotype is associated with diabetes resistance. DR molecules, such as DRB1*1401, confer protection from diabetes. Monozygotic twins of patients with type 1A diabetes have a diabetes risk higher than that for HLA-identical ordinary siblings, suggesting that non-HLA genes contribute to diabetes risk. Polymorphisms in the regulatory region of the insulin gene (designated IDDM2), polymorphisms in cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) gene (IDDM12), and other genes are likely to contribute to diabetes risk and susceptibility in some individuals. In selected families, major diabetogenes (e.g., IDDM17, autoimmune regulator gene (AIRE)) are likely to be of importance. Other factors--either noninherited genes (i.e., somatic mutations and T-cell receptor or immunoglobulin rearrangements) or environment--may have a role in progression to diabetes. This is suggested by the finding that the risk for monozygotic twins of patients with type 1A diabetes is not 100 percent. Studying the genetics of type 1A diabetes will allow us to better define this disease, to improve our ability to identify individuals at risk, and to predict the risk of associated disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/rp.56.1.69

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reports suggest a recent temporal trend of fewer high-risk HLA genotypes in youth diagnosed with type 1 diabetes, suggesting an increased influence of environmental factors during recent decades.

    “A number of reports suggest a recent temporal trend of fewer high-risk HLA genotypes in youth diagnosed with T1D, suggesting an increased influence of environmental factors in the development of T1D during the past few decades19,44,45.”

    From Epidemiology of type 1 diabetes (2010) · cites this paper as [45]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 1 · Cited by 183

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Anderson, B., Park, B.J., Verdaguer, J., Amrani, A., and Santamaria, P. (1999). Proc. Nail. Acad. Sci.
  2. Bao, F., Rewers, M., Scott, F., and Eisenbarth, G.S. (1999a). In "Endocrine and Organ Specific Autoimmunity" (G.S. Eisenbarth, ed.), pp. 85-96.
  3. Gjertson, D.W., and Terasaki, P.1. (eds.) (1998). "HLA." American Society of Immunocompatibility and Genetics, Lenexa, Tex.
  4. Maes, M, and Eisenbarth, G.S. (1999). In "Contemporary Endocrinology on Autoimmune Endocri- nopathies" (R. Volpe, ed.), pp. 349-363. Humana Press, Inc., Totowa, N.J.
  5. Morel, P.A., Dorman, J.S., Todd, J.A., McDevitt, H.O., and Trucco, M. (1988). Proc. Nat/. Acad. Ser. USA. 85,8111-8115.
  6. Redondo, M.J., and Eisenbarth, G.S. (1997). In "Endocrine and Organ Specific Autoimmunity" (G.S. Eisenbarth, ed.), pp. 41-61.

Authors
Redondo, M. J.
Corresponding author
Redondo, M. J.
Venue
Recent Progress in Hormone Research
Published
2001-01-01
Volume
56
Issue
1
Pages
69-90
ISSN
0079-9963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052255259
Cited by
183
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
FWCI
0.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Recent Progress in Hormone Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
Keywords
type 1A diabetes, genetic susceptibility, non-HLA genes, CTLA-4, autoimmune regulator gene, monozygotic twin discordance, somatic mutations, T-cell receptor gene rearrangement, immunoglobulin gene rearrangement, autoimmune disease genetics
MeSH terms
Alleles, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Family Health, Haplotypes, HLA-DQ Antigens, Humans, Insulin, Major Histocompatibility Complex, Models, Genetic, Polymorphism, Genetic, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Twin Studies as Topic, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, HLA-DQ alpha-Chains, HLA-DQ beta-Chains

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review