Cited by 370RNA Interference and Gene DeliveryNanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryDendrimers and Hyperbranched Polymers

Polycation gene delivery systems: escape from endosomes to cytosol

Cho, Yong Woo, Kim, Jong-Duk, Park, Kinam·2003·Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology

Abstract

Clinical success of gene therapy based on oligonucleotides (ODNs), ribozymes, RNA and DNA will be greatly dependent on the availability of effective delivery systems. Polycations have gained increasing attention as a non-viral gene delivery vector in the past decades. Significant progress has been made in understanding complex formation between polycations and nucleic acids, entry of the complex into the cells and subsequent entry into the nucleus. Sophisticated molecular architectures of cationic polymers have made the vectors more stable and less susceptible to binding by enzymes or proteins. Incorporation of specific ligands to polycations has resulted in more cell-specific uptake by receptor-mediated mechanisms. However, there are still other barriers limiting the transfection efficiency of polycation gene delivery systems. There is a consensus that polycation-DNA complexes (polyplexes) enter cells via the endocytotic pathway. It is not clearly understood, however, how the polyplexes escape (if they do) from endosomes, how DNA is released from the polyplexes or how the released DNA is expressed. The primary focus of this article is to review various polycation gene delivery systems, which are designed to translocate DNA from endosomes into cytosol. Many polycation gene delivery systems have tried to mimic the mechanisms that viruses use for the endosomal escape. Polycation gene delivery systems are usually coupled with synthetic amphipathic peptides mimicking viral fusogenic peptides, histidine-based gene delivery systems for pH-responsive endosomal escape, polycations with intrinsic endosomolytic activity by the proton sponge mechanism and polyanions to mimic the anionic amphiphilic peptides.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1211/002235703765951311

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 62 · Cited by 370

Authors
Cho, Y. W., Kim, J.-D., & Park, K.
Affiliations
  • Akina (United States) (US)
  • Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
Park, Kinam
Venue
Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology
Published
2003-06-01
Volume
55
Issue
6
Pages
721-734
ISSN
  • 0022-3573 (ISSN-L)
  • 2042-7158
OpenAlex
W2029532796
Cited by
370
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 28
FWCI
1.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Dendrimers and Hyperbranched Polymers
Keywords
endosomal escape, non-viral vectors, polyplexes, cationic polymers, endocytosis, pH-responsive polymers, proton sponge effect, peptide amphiphiles, fusion peptide, polyanions, DNA transfection, receptor-mediated uptake
MeSH terms
Polyelectrolytes, Cytosol, DNA-Binding Proteins, Humans, Peptides, Polyamines, Endosomes, Structure-Activity Relationship, Genetic Therapy, Drug Delivery Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review