Cited by 25Drug Solubulity and Delivery SystemsPharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms

Pharmacokinetics of letrozole in male and female rats: influence of complexation with hydroxybutenyl-β-cyclodextrin

Wempe, Michael F, Buchanan, Charles M, Buchanan, Norma L, Edgar, Kevin J, Hanley, Gregory A, Ramsey, Michael G, Skotty, Jennifer S, Rice, Peter J·2007·Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology

Abstract

Cyclodextrins (CDs) are one of the most successful solutions to the problem of poor drug solubility. In this study, we examined the in-vitro effects of three CDs on the solubility of letrozole, a breast cancer drug that is practically insoluble in water. The most promising, hydroxybutenyl-β-cyclodextrin (HBenβCD), was used for in-vivo studies in male and female Sprague-Dawley rats. Letrozole is a drug with dramatic gender-based differences in pharmacokinetics. For example, the terminal half-life (t1/2) of letrozole following intravenous administration in male rats was 11.5 ± 1.8 h (n = 3), while in female rats it was 42.3 ± 2.9 h (n = 3). HBenβCD increased the solubility and enhanced the dissolution rate of letrozole. Complexation of letrozole with HBenβCD improved oral absorption in male rats and maximized absorption in female rats. Regardless of gender, the presence of HBenβCD in the formulation increased the in-vivo rate of absorption. When administered in a capsule formulation with letrozole, HBenβCD resulted in a higher Cmax (61% in male rats, 42% in female), shorter Tmax values (8.4 to 6.3 h in male, 16.4 h to 5.4 h in female) and increased absolute oral bioavailability (46 ± 2 vs 38 ± 3 in male, 101 ± 3 vs 95 ± 2 in female). Thus, solubility limits both rate and extent of letrozole absorption in male rats, but limits only the rate of absorption in female rats.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1211/jpp.59.6.0006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wempe, M. F., Buchanan, C. M., Buchanan, N. L., Edgar, K. J., Hanley, G. A., Ramsey, M. G., Skotty, J. S., & Rice, P. J.
Affiliations
  • East Tennessee State University (US)
  • Eastman Chemical Company (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Rice, Peter J
Venue
Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology
Published
2007-06-01
Volume
59
Issue
6
Pages
795-802
ISSN
  • 0022-3573 (ISSN-L)
  • 2042-7158
OpenAlex
W2039605753
Cited by
25
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - East Tennessee State University (East Tennessee State University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Eastman Chemical Company
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
Keywords
letrozole, cyclodextrin complexation, drug solubility enhancement, dissolution rate, oral bioavailability, sex differences in pharmacokinetics, oral absorption, poorly water-soluble drugs, capsule formulation
MeSH terms
Letrozole, Administration, Oral, Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, Biological Availability, Capsules, Chemistry, Pharmaceutical, Female, Humans, Injections, Intravenous, Male, Nitriles, Sex Factors, Solubility, Triazoles, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, beta-Cyclodextrins, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review