Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 313

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Global and domain-specific cognitive impairment and outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage

Mayer, S. A., Kreiter, K. T., Copeland, D., Bernardini, G. L., Bates, J. E., Peery, S., Claassen, J., Du, Y. E., Connolly, E. S.·2002·Neurology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cognitive dysfunction is the most common form of neurologic impairment after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of global and domain-specific cognitive impairment on functional recovery and quality of life (QOL) after SAH. METHODS: One hundred thirteen patients (mean age 49 years; 68% women) were evaluated 3 months after SAH. Three simple tests of global mental status and neuropsychological tests to assess seven specific cognitive domains were administered. Four aspects of outcome (global handicap, disability, emotional status, and QOL) were compared between cognitively impaired and unimpaired patients with analysis-of-covariance models controlling for age, race/ethnicity, and education. Multiple linear regression was used to evaluate the relative contribution of global and domain-specific cognitive status for predicting concurrent modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) scores. RESULTS: Impairment of global mental status on the Telephone Interview of Cognitive Status (TICS) was associated with poor performance in all seven cognitive domains (all p < 0.0005) and was the only cognitive measure associated with poor recovery in all four aspects of outcome (all p < or = 0.005). Cognitive impairment in four specific domains was also associated with functional disability or reduced QOL. After accounting for global cognitive impairment with the TICS, however, neuropsychological testing did not contribute additional predictive value for concurrent mRS or SIP total scores. CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive impairment impacts broadly on functional status, emotional health, and QOL after SAH. The TICS may be a useful alternative to more detailed neuropsychological testing for detecting clinically relevant global cognitive impairment after SAH.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/01.wnl.0000035748.91128.c2

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 313

Metadata

Authors
Mayer, S. A., Kreiter, K. T., Copeland, D., Bernardini, G. L., Bates, J. E., Peery, S., Claassen, J., Du, Y. E., & Connolly, E. S.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2002-12-10
Volume
59
Issue
11
Pages
1750-1758
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2092773248
Cited by
313
References
22
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global and domain-specific cognitive impairment and outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/01.wnl.0000035748.91128.c2
The paper
Mayer, S. A., Kreiter, K. T., Copeland, D., Bernardini, G. L., Bates, J. E., Peery, S., Claassen, J., Du, Y. E., & Connolly, E. S. (2002). Global and domain-specific cognitive impairment and outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000035748.91128.c2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.