Cited by 207Hereditary Neurological DisordersPeripheral Neuropathies and DisordersPain Mechanisms and Treatments

The effect of age and gender on epidermal nerve fiber density

Gøransson, L. G., Mellgren, S. I., Lindal, S., Omdal, R.·2004·Neurology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Sensory neuropathies often involve small-diameter myelinated and unmyelinated nerve fibers, and neurologic and electrophysiologic findings may be normal unless larger nerve fibers are involved. The small (intra)epidermal nerve fibers (ENFs) now can be visualized with immunohistochemical techniques using the panaxonal marker anti-protein gene product 9.5 (PGP 9.5). Using this technique, the authors have established a reference range for ENF in a healthy white population and evaluated the reliability of the method. METHODS: Two punch biopsies, 3 mm in diameter, were taken from the distal part of the leg in 106 healthy volunteers (mean age, 49.0 +/- 19.6 years). Fifty-micrometer frozen thick sections were incubated with rabbit polyclonal antibodies to human PGP 9.5. The number of ENF/mm then was reported as the mean of counts in six sections (three sections from each of the two biopsies). RESULTS: The mean number of ENFs was 12.4 +/- 4.6 mm. In a multiple regression model, the density of ENF depended on age and gender (Y = 13.92 + 2.25 (gender) - 0.06 x age). The mean difference in ENF by intraobserver analysis was 0.2 +/- 1.2 ENF/mm, and by interobserver analysis, it was 0.4 +/- 1.5 fibers/mm. CONCLUSION: Normal means and ranges for the density of epidermal nerve fibers in a reference population have been established. The density of epidermal nerve fibers decreases with age and is lower in men compared with women. Intraobserver and interobserver analysis proves the r…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/01.wnl.0000113732.41127.8f

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several healthy men in the control cohort had a reduced IENFD, as shown in previous studies, although all participants were screened negative for known causes of small fiber pathology.

    “Furthermore, several healthy men in our control cohort had a reduced IENFD as already shown in previous studies13,19 although all participants were screened negative for known causes of small fiber pathology.”
  • The authors' normative values for IENFD are based merely on one standard deviation from the mean, and published studies reported similar or higher cut-off values.

    “Our normative values for IENFD are already based merely on one standard deviation from the mean, considering that published studies addressing normative values for IENFD reported similar or even higher cut-off values.19,24,29”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 18 · Cited by 207

Authors
Gøransson, L. G., Mellgren, S. I., Lindal, S., & Omdal, R.
Affiliations
University Hospital of North Norway (NO)
Venue
Neurology
Published
2004-03-09
Volume
62
Issue
5
Pages
774-777
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2087340224
Cited by
207
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Hereditary Neurological Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
epidermal nerve fibers, intraepidermal nerve fibers, PGP 9.5, sensory neuropathy, age effects, sex differences, reference values, skin biopsy, method reliability, small nerve fibers
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aging, Epidermis, Female, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Middle Aged, Nerve Fibers, Reference Values, Reproducibility of Results, Ubiquitin Thiolesterase, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review