Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 642

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Insulin therapy protects the central and peripheral nervous system of intensive care patients

Van den Berghe, G., Schoonheydt, K., Becx, P., Bruyninckx, F., Wouters, P. J.·2005·Neurology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of maintaining blood glucose levels below 6.1 mmol/L with insulin as prevention of secondary injury to the central and peripheral nervous systems of intensive care patients. METHODS: The authors studied the effect of intensive insulin therapy on critical illness polyneuropathy (CIPNP), assessed by weekly EMG screening, and its impact on mechanical ventilation dependency, as a prospectively planned subanalysis of a large randomized, controlled trial of 1,548 intensive care patients. In the 63 patients admitted with isolated brain injury, the authors studied the impact of insulin therapy on intracranial pressure, diabetes insipidus, seizures, and long-term rehabilitation at 6 and 12 months follow-up. RESULTS: Intensive insulin therapy reduced ventilation dependency (p = 0.0007; Mantel-Cox log rank test) and the risk of CIPNP (p < 0.0001). The risk of CIPNP among the 405 long-stay (> or =7 days in intensive care unit) patients was lowered by 49% (p < 0.0001). Of all metabolic and clinical effects of insulin therapy, and corrected for known risk factors, the level of glycemic control independently explained this benefit (OR for CIPNP 1.26 [1.09 to 1.46] per mmol blood glucose, p = 0.002). In turn, prevention of CIPNP explained the ability of intensive insulin therapy to reduce the risk of prolonged mechanical ventilation (OR 3.75 [1.49 to 9.39], p = 0.005). In isolated brain injury patients, intensive insulin therapy reduced mean (p = 0.003) and maximal (p < 0.0001) intracranial pressure while identical cerebral perfusion pressures were obtained with eightfold less vasopressors (p = 0.01). Seizures (p < 0.0001) and diabetes insipidus (p = 0.06) occurred less frequently. At 12 months follow-up, more brain-injured survivors in the intensive insulin group were able to care for most of their own needs (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Preventing even moderate hyperglycemia with insulin during intensive care protected the central and peripheral nervous systems, with clinical consequences such as shortening of intensive care dependency and possibly better long-term rehabilitation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/01.wnl.0000158442.08857.fc

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 642

Metadata

Authors
Van den Berghe, G., Schoonheydt, K., Becx, P., Bruyninckx, F., & Wouters, P. J.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2005-04-26
Volume
64
Issue
8
Pages
1348-1353
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2113621578
Cited by
642
References
1
FWCI
37.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Insulin therapy protects the central and peripheral nervous system of intensive care patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/01.wnl.0000158442.08857.fc
The paper
Van den Berghe, G., Schoonheydt, K., Becx, P., Bruyninckx, F., & Wouters, P. J. (2005). Insulin therapy protects the central and peripheral nervous system of intensive care patients. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000158442.08857.fc

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.