Cited by 68Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAging and Gerontology ResearchAging, Health, and Disability

Dementia incidence may increase more slowly after age 90: Results from the Bronx Aging Study

Hall, C. B., Verghese, J., Sliwinski, M., Chen, Z., Katz, M., Derby, C., Lipton, R. B.·2005·Neurology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dementia incidence increases dramatically from age 65 to age 85, with many studies reporting a doubling every 5 years. The incidence beyond age 85 is not established. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incidence of dementia as a function of age, with a particular focus on persons aged 85 and over. METHODS: The Bronx Aging Study began in 1980 with 488 healthy, nondemented community-dwelling individuals, age 75 to 85. Persons in the study received clinical examinations and cognitive testing approximately every 12 months until death or loss to follow-up. The diagnosis of dementia was made using Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-III-R at diagnostic case conferences. Dementia incidence rates were calculated for 5-year age bands using person-time of follow-up as the denominator. RESULTS: The relative incidence rate ratios of dementia for age 80 to 84 vs 75 to 79 was 2.32 (95% CI 1.23 to 4.37), the relative rate for age 85 to 89 vs 80 to 84 was 1.89 (95% CI 1.26 to 2.83), the relative rate for age 90 to 94 vs 85 to 89 was 1.49 (95% CI 0.86 to 2.58), while the relative rate for age 95 to 99 vs 90 to 94 was 1.31 (95% CI 0.38 to 4.46). Similar results were seen for men and women considered separately. Had the rate of increase from age 75 to 89 continued into the 90s, the study would have had 73% power to detect a significant difference between the rates for age 90 to 94 and 85 to 89 given the amount of observed follow-up time. CONCLUSIONS: Whereas dementia incidence continues to increase beyond age 85, the rate of increase appears to slow relative to that of 65- to 85-year-olds. These results suggest that dementia in the oldest old might be related not to the aging process itself but with age-associated risk factors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/01.wnl.0000176053.98907.3f

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 68

Authors
Hall, C. B., Verghese, J., Sliwinski, M., Chen, Z., Katz, M., Derby, C., & Lipton, R. B.
Affiliations
Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
Venue
Neurology
Published
2005-09-27
Volume
65
Issue
6
Pages
882-886
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2119806303
Cited by
68
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (P01AG003949, AG03949-15)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
Keywords
dementia incidence, oldest old, age-related risk factors, incidence rate ratio, community-dwelling older adults, cognitive aging
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Dementia, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, New York City, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Causality, Incidence, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review