Cited by 93Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsPolyomavirus and related diseases

Changes in the ascertainment of multiple sclerosis

Marrie, R. A., Cutter, G., Tyry, T., Hadjimichael, O., Campagnolo, D., Vollmer, T.·2005·Neurology

Abstract

Objective With diagnostic criteria alterations, increased MRI availability, and awareness of therapies, temporal changes in incidence and prevalence rates may occur, with an increase in the proportion of mildly affected persons diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (MS). The authors assessed temporal trends in the delay from symptom onset to diagnosis (DONDX), and determined whether the degree of disability at diagnosis differs by year of symptom onset (YONSET), using the NARCOMS Registry. Methods The authors selected US participants with an age at symptom onset of 10 to 60 years, and YONSET > or = 1980 (n = 16,581). The authors divided YONSET into 5-year groups and compared DONDX between groups using multivariate Cox regression. The authors classified participants enrolled within 2 years of diagnosis (n = 5,548) as having mild, moderate, or severe disability using Patient Determined Disease Steps, and assessed the association of disability with YONSET using polytomous logistic regression. Results DONDX decreased with later YONSET (r = -0.43, p Conclusion The delay from symptom onset to diagnosis is steadily decreasing in MS. An increasing proportion of patients with MS have mild disability at diagnosis after accounting for confounders. As the effectiveness of therapies is influenced by disease duration, this has implications for comparison of treatment effects in modern clinical trials to earlier study results.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/01.wnl.0000178891.20579.64

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Authors
Marrie, R. A., Cutter, G., Tyry, T., Hadjimichael, O., Campagnolo, D., & Vollmer, T.
Affiliations
Cleveland Clinic (US)
Venue
Neurology
Published
2005-10-11
Volume
65
Issue
7
Pages
1066-1070
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2079691677
Cited by
93
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Polyomavirus and related diseases
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, delayed diagnosis, mild disabilities, temporal trends in diagnosis, disease duration, NARCOMS registry, Patient-Determined Disease Steps, MRI availability, treatment effect comparison
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Child, Preschool, Disability Evaluation, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Registries, Sex Factors, Time Factors, Selection Bias, Incidence, Prevalence, Multivariate Analysis, Age of Onset, Disease Progression, Early Diagnosis, Racial Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review